Monday, August 15, 2011

Perry Packs The Hamburg

Perry Packs The Hamburg



One thing's for sure: on Day Three of his campaign, Rick Perry is a big draw.

Hamburg inn wait staff said people began showing up at 1:30 for an event that was first billed as 3:45 p.m., then 3:30, and by the time I arrived "sometime after 3." I didn't manage to get inside until after the Texas governor had departed on the Platybus, but Panther colorfully described indoor conditions as: "it's butt to butt in there."


This is what democracy looks like: what the inside of the Hamburg Inn looked like from the outside

The crowd was likely the biggest for an event at the north side diner and political landmark since a 2007 John Edwards event. Edwards never actually set foot inside, but instead spoke to the crowd from the campaign bus.

Perry did not speak; before his arrival a staffer told me the vent was just a meet and greet. Still, that disappointed a few folks in the crowd: supporters, curious Republicans, lefty protesters, and all manner of local and national press. "I was kind of hoping he'd get up and say something," said Panther. Nevertheless, he was snapping pictures, introduced some of his staff to Perry, and just generally seemed proud of his establishment's tradition.

Event organizers carefully lined up supporters at the doors for a nice TV backdrop for Perry, as protesters shouted questions. "Are you going to end Social Security? Are you going to end Social Security?" one older gentleman shouted repeatedly, waving a sign and literally shaking with rage. Across the street, another group managed to work in the Hey Hey Ho Ho chant and the This Is What Democracy Looks Like chant, but failed to complete the trifecta with When Do We Want It? Now!

I didn't get close enough to try for a question - mine was going to be more inside basebally about reaching out to Pawlenty supporters - but I did get close enough to hear that Texas drawl (flashback?): "How y'all doin? Glad y'all could make it."



The advance staff had the kind of faux Secret Service vibe that the 2007 Romney and Giuliani campaigns tried to project: earpieces, coded pins, sending a message of This Is A Very Important Man. At least one serious looking guy was Iowa State Patrol plainclothes. Perry campaign staff had been on the ground about five days before the event, and Panther said that was when he was contacted, about five days ago.



Waiting outside, the "discussion" between late arriving Republicans who couldn't squeeze in and picketers (both traditional lefties and Ron Paul folks) got heated occasionally, but no trips to Fist City.

All in all, probably a good media hit for Perry, and it looked like everyone who really wanted a handshake or autograph and was willing to work a little for it got one. But if he's back, I'm sure the local GOP and press corps would appreciate a little speech and a little Q and A.

Bachmann Repeating Hillary's Mistakes

Bachmann Repeating Hillary's Mistakes?

While Iowa City waits for Rick Perry's Hamburg Inn appearance this afternoon, Politico offers a must-read on the face-off between the Platypus and Michele Bachmann yesterday in Waterloo, saying Perry emerged as a clear winner:
Perry arrived early, as did former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum. The Texas governor let a media throng grow and dissolve before working his way across the room to sit at table after table, shake hand after hand, pose for photographs and listen politely to a windy Abraham Lincoln impersonator, paying respect to a state that expects candidates, no matter their fame, to be accessible.

But Bachmann campaigned like a celebrity. And the event highlighted the brittle, presidential-style cocoon that has become her campaign’s signature: a routine of late entries, unexplained absences, quick exits, sharp-elbowed handlers with matching lapel pins, and pre-selected questioners.
I wasn't there yesterday, but it's eerily familiar:
The Clinton campaign, in contrast, ran a cautious general election campaign in the ultimate retail environment. But like a singer with perfect pitch who misses the meaning of the song, Clinton kept errors to a minimum but failed to capture the spontaneous spirit of the caucuses. She started out doing one on one meetings with undecided local activists, but as her national lead held, Clinton moved toward a "general election strategy," as she said at a debate. By the time Obama was catching up in the fall, it was too late to go back and adapt.

No one incident captures this perfectly, but little detail after little detail paints the picture.

A staffer subtly steering me away from a friend of many years, directing her to the public seats and me to the roped off press area. Offering the press free pizza after the speech, rather than what we really wanted: time to ask the candidate a question.
The analogy isn't perfect, of course. Clinton was supremely qualified for the big job, and has served with distinction as secretary of state. But the same tone-deafness to the caucuses, right down to the planted questions, is there.

Yes, we Iowans are spoiled. But if you are going to make a serious caucus run, you can't just show up and give the speech. You have to shake every hand, pose for every picture, and allow every question, even when the questioner is obviously a looney tune. (You have to have a staffer who can gently lead you away from such people.) You have to have a rebuttal ready for the disruptive protester. (And this is bipartisan, as some groups don't distinguish between a hostile Republican and an imperfect Democrat. I saw Bob Kerrey get chased out of the state back in 1991 by pointed questions from the left.)

And you have to keep doing it, event after event. Bachmann has the skill set, I've seen it. But she can't abandon the one on one stuff just because she won one straw poll and switch into what Hillary Clinton called "general election mode." She has to shake the same hands a third and fourth time and fifth. Caucus-goers see it as a birthright. The old joke is that a national reporter asks a caucus veteran if they're voting for so and so and the Iowan replies: "I don't know. I've only met him three times." The punchline is: this isn't a joke.

Whether or not he knows it, Rick Perry is taking a big risk coming to the People's Republic on Day Three of his campaign. But we'll see how he handles it. As for Bachmann, it's not too late for her to adapt... but she'll need to.

Sunday, August 14, 2011

Pawlenty Quitting

Pawlenty Quitting

Just breaking that Tpaw will announce today that he's dropping out of the presidential race. Obviously yesterday's weak third in the straw poll, with Bachmann first and Ron Paul nearly tied, was not just disappointing, it was fatal.

In the old days of brokered conventions, Tim Pawlenty might have won the big prize: acceptable to pretty much everyone in the party, offensive to few. He didn't hurt himself enough to knock himself out of the VP mix. And in a nomination system where Powers That Be still exerted significant influence, he may have had a chance.

But in an atmosphere that values style over substance, and in a party that values gridlock over governing, he didn't have a prayer. The debate scraps between Pawlenty and Bachmann just three days ago are a microcosm of his entire fate. Bachmann pointed to all the "fights" she's fought -- no debt ceiling this, no light bulb mandates that. Pawlenty noted she hadn't actually WON any of these fights. The Republican Party responded with a collective "So what?"



So who does this help? No one a whole lot, because I don't see an en masse move to one candidate. The question is more: Who does this NOT help?

It doesn't help Romney. He and TPaw were competing for much of the same "grownup" niche, and I'm thinking anyone who was with a struggling TPaw instead of nominal national frontrunner Romney has already rejected Mitt for whatever reason: Obamneycare (that word may be TPaw's lasting contribution to this race) or, without saying so, his religion.

It doesn't help Bachmann or Paul, who are running on explicitly different messages. I suspect TPaw's people share the ex-candidate's disdain for Bachmann. Paul's success depends entirely on maximizing turnout in his Peace and Gold niche. The straw poll, with its emphasis on intense commitment, may have already done that.

Herman Cain is already dead, he just doesn't know it yet. Huntsman's not playing, and who knows what the hell Thad McCotter is doing. Maybe a handful of folks gravitate to Newt, but not many.

So that leaves the Ricks. Santorum got just enough support at just the right time to stay alive. And as I consider it, the core case for him and Pawlenty has some similarities: experience, ability to win on tough turf, solid conservative record on social issues.

Of course, Santorum emphasized those social issues more, and I think that accounted for much of his surprisingly strong 10% yesterday. (Bachmann, who got into politics on that cluster of issues in the first place, should have owned that vote.) As for electoral success, Santorum has the albatross of losing his senate seat by 20 points. He has an answer for that -- it was an annus horriblis for Republicans -- but Pawlenty managed to keep his job that year.

And so did Rick Perry, though it was with just 39% in a bizarre four way race. Perry has been a polarizer within his party the last half decade: In 2006 Carole Keeton Strayhorn dropped a primary challenge to run independent and win 18%, and last year sitting Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison challenged him. (Both women. Interesting implication vis a vis Bachmann.)

The Platypus enters the race with TPaw's 13% of the straw poll vote and a decent organization shaken loose from the moorings this Sunday morning. This list of 29 county chairs may be populated with Some Dudes, but at least 10 legislators were on board. Pawlenty's body may not be cold yet, but that's a good list of phone calls for the Ricks to be making ASAP.

Saturday, August 13, 2011

Notes from the Non-Credentialed 2

Notes from the Non-Credentialed 2

Voting's been done 45 minutes, still on standby.

At 4:53 we hear 17,000 votes. So how long wil the write ins take? Chuck Todd tays there's "lots."

Steve King again does the Yay Caucuses bit, and there's a hint he's none to pleased with the Platypus for stepping on the straw poll. Grassley talks, my big takeaway is he told Mitt he needs to get out here.

Hearing a "soon" on results, though not an official Five Minute Warning, at 5:33.

OK, show time at 5:41.4823/

16,892, votes. Winner = Bachmann. And that's all we get. I thought they were counting down, So THAT's how they dealt with the write ins.

5:47 we get the numbers. Paul damn near tied. TPaw distrant third.

Bachmann 4823 28.7%
Paul 4671 27.8
Pawlenty 2293 13.7
Santorum 1657 9.9
Cain 1456 8.7
WRITE IN TOTAL 936
Romney 567 3.3
Gingrich 385 2.3
Huntsman 69 0.4
McCotter 35 0.2

That leaves 936 total write ins

Paul can claim de facto tie (and does)
TPaw at poor third = trouble
Santorum can survive 4th
Cain is finished
Write in total = even if all for Perry, not a big win
Mitt and Huntsman = Iowa Republicans punish those who don't play.
Newt and McCotter are on their own trips so won't quit. But McCotter joins Roemer and Gary Johnson as officially fringe. McCotter bails sometime close to Michigan filing deadline for re-election.

Now they say Perry 718 write ins and that I had the total vote right the first time. Not gonna recalculate the percentages, they don't change much....

That also means only about 200 other write ins. How did they count Parry?

OK, here's the latest at 6:10

1. Congresswoman Michele Bachmann (4823, 28.55%)
2. Congressman Ron Paul (4671, 27.65%)
3. Governor Tim Pawlenty (2293, 13.57%)
4. Senator Rick Santorum (1657, 9.81%)
5. Herman Cain(1456, 8.62%)
6. Governor Rick Perry (718, 3.62%) write-in
7. Governor Mitt Romney (567, 3.36%)
8. Speaker Newt Gingrich (385, 2.28%)
9. Governor Jon Huntsman (69, 0.41%)
10. Congressman Thad McCotter (35, 0.21%)
Scattering (162, 0.96 %) Includes all those receiving votes at less than one-percent that were not on the ballot.

So they're not releasing anything else? Palin under 1% at best...

Chuck Todd with Santorum. Rick claiming third "of those who could win Iowa," continuing the debate feud with Ron Paul. Chuck asks him if he's getting into the PA Senate race.

Funny to see Wasserman Schultz here in Iowa, considering how much of a caucus bashing, Florida leapfrog lover she was in 2008. And still is; Chuck says Dems need something like Ames and DWS makes sure to say it should be in Florida.

Notes from the Non-Credentialed

Notes from the Non-Credentialed

No, I'm not there. Got turned down for press credentials. SCored a ticket but decided it wasn't worth the full day just to write in Barack Obama and see if they counted it.

We're in media split screen mode at 12:30.as Rick Perry gives his announcement speech. Damn, he sounds exactly like W. I still have him pegged as the Fred Thompson of 2011. Does the post-speech analysis step on Santorum's speech?

No, they cut back to Ames and we get Branstad, basching "Brock" Obama. Of course, the speeches aren't the story. The cattle call moment with all on stage... except where's TPaw? The moment is brief and MSNBC interviews Obradovich through whole thing.

12:46. Santorum on stage but MSNBC still with Mitt story. Here's my bets:

1 Bachmann
2 Paul
3 TPAW
4 Santorum

Rick has wife and 5 of the 7 kids on stage with him. The finally cut to him. Sounds like the stump speech I heard last week. "I will not back down on the sanctity of life or the integrity of the American family. America is a moral enterprise." Still hustling for that BVP endorsement. (Speaking of which, that mass email from Chuck Hurley was an annoying tease: "We endorse..." "the people of Iowa!"

Santorum complains again about debate time and goes into the Little Engine That Could riff.

"Obamacare is the single greatest threat..." uses again the Maggie Thatcher quote about never being able to reverse UK direction because of National Health. Soon after that MSNBC cuts away.

I finally find CSPAN, all they way up on channel 97, and Santorum is citing his lengthy anti-choice bona fides and wraps at 1:00 straight up. Rally music is some country rock track I don't recognize, and Matt Strawn intros Kim Reynolds.

Strawn has spun the GOP closing the party reg gap to the MSNBC dude, presumably not mentioning that most of that is from their divisive 2010 primary.

Network cuts to Ron Paul already in progress, talking more about abortion than he usually does, for several minutes. He must figure he's got his people already, trying to reach some of the others. "You cannot be pro liberty without being pro-life, as I understand it." But he's working taxes = theft and "undeclared unwinnable wars" and the Patriot Act too. "We cannot defend liberty without by taking liberty away." Claque: Ron! Paul! Ron! Paul!

MSNBC with a talking head, back to CSPAN. He's on to the Fed... will we hear the G word? YES! GOLD! EVERYBODY DRINK!

"It's time. to bring. the troops. home." Loud shouts from the claque. Basically the standard Ron PAul Speech, but delivered well. Paul wraps, they show a Strong America Now vid, MSNBC goes back to discussing the Platypus.

Back at CSPAN I find myself agreeing with... STEVE KING?!? He's praising Iowa First, so yeah, I can work with you on that Steve. But soom he's back to his usual stuff so I'm on the other side and all is right with the universe again.

TPaw gets introduces with a fast cut video followed by musuc that sounds like a movie soundtrack. Leads with Ronnie Good, Obama Bad. Then into some numbered outline points. He's hitting all the right points, but making the mistake of calling Obama "Mr. President" which may be nails on chalkboard to this crowd. There's not much time left and we're at least 80% Obama-bash. OK, now on to his case: "I don't just talk about it, I get the job done." (Take that Bachmann) "No individual mandates (take that Mitt) "Results, not just talk, is what America needs now."

"We need to not just preach to the choir... I got elected and re-elected in one of the most difficult states for a Republican." Comes out if favor of apple pie and gets some U-S-A! chants. More generic country rock for stage music. While Grassley speaks, the networks show Paul and Santorum highlights.

Bachmann hits stage after a video hagiography and to some remixed Elvis. She leads with a lot of We Are Going To Do It Together And Take It Back! Sounds kind of shouty to me. ONE! TERM! PRESIDENT! DRINK! Playing the I'm An Iowan card again. "Everything I Needed To Konw I Learened In Iowa!" (Again: she left when she was 12.) Some social issues -- but then back to Iowa Iowa Iowa. At least the Sullivan Brothers actually were from Waterloo.

This is definitely not a policy-specific speech. She's gonna march her folks over to the voting, to the tune of, yes, Elvis doing Chuck Berry's "Promised Land." (That's late, Vegas-era Elvis.) Seems like a sizable crew leaving the front of the stage before Tom Latham talks. Not much memorable there, and he looks dull compared to Bachmann...

But he rocks like ELvis compared to our next guest. Yes, it's McCotter time! Several polite applause line, but nothing brings the house down. Speech pattern has improved a bit since last week. No one packed in front of stage; this may be Eat Time or Vote Time. Anyone who finishes below this guy is toast.

Talking heads are Huntsman This and Romney that and Perry The Other as the Herman Cain intro video rolls. Unlike Thad, he has a claque of supporters down front. They're actually 15 minutes AHEAD of schedule; Herman wasn't due on till 3:15 and it's only 3. This IS a policy detail speech but the tl;dr version is Cut Taxes.

Did he just say we got a "funky foreign policy"? Tear the rook off the sucka! A couple of the people up front are in TPaw shirts.

Speeches wrap at 3:11, Strawn says voting done at 4. Back at MSNBC, pundits still talk Perry.

Thursday, August 11, 2011

Debate livetweets

I inadvertently livetweeted the whole debate:



Why is Mitt taking a shot at Ron Paul? What possible gain?

Newt: I used to be someone important

TPaw gets better of Mitt's lawn

Who will try to top Santorum by actually proposing negative taxes?

Bachmann seething with not liking TPaw, feeling seems mutual

MB doubles down on TPaw=Obama

That Herman Cain alliance oughta net Mitt 1 or 2%, but please go back to the all Bachmann-TPaw format

Wallace: Your campaign sucks. Newt: You suck.

Huntsman: Where am I? Idaho? Ohio?

Wallace: Are you an idiot? Cain: In what respect, Charlie?

Cain: I have learned more, and i should have this down in 8 years

Huntsman proposes Great Border Wall of China

Cain: My statements are a joke. Deeth: I'm with ya there.

Cain: America as gated community?

Newt, who calls Obama "food stamp president," bashes Obama for making attacks

Ron Paul seems to have loudest claque

Fox: You raised taxes. Mitt: I don't believe in raising taxes and didn't raise taxes, and it doesn't count because it's Massachusetts

TPaw: It doesn't count because it's Minnesota

Bachmann: It doesn't count because it's Minnesota

Yay, another TPaw Bachmann fight! what if the fetuses were smoking untaxed cigarettes?

TPaw looking defensive, gets all double negative. (Legislators can be "Pure" executive have to govern)

Santorum: I'm still here

All hands go up for Grover Norquist.

Newt: I used to be important

TPaw gets a do-over on Obamneycare. Mitt's face: why is this guy on my stage?

The do-over is still too nice, Mitt makes a joke of it and goes Tenther. And it doesn't count because it's Massachusetts

Ron Paul backed into a corner of free market vs state's rights, gets applause from claque anyway

Santorum getting noticably desperate for time, says Jeezus trumps 10th

No one on stage is as comic relief crazy as Mike Gravel. Or Am I just so numbed by the hard right drift that it doesn't SEEM as crazy?

Most embarrassing potty break of Bachmann's life

Paul: Opens mouth. Paul crowd: YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY

Huntsman: Yup, still here.

And of course the Palin Question goes to Bachmann

Newt: Rudy Giuliani used to be someone important

Praising the troops gets TPaw an easy applause line

Wonder what neo-Con(federate) Rick Parry will say about "wars of independence for another nation"? Yee-haw. perhaps?

Newt thinks debate is against moderators

Huntsman just itching for a DOS attack from Anonymous

Where's Herman: off making a delivery? I said extra cheese!

TPaw has this down: gets applause first for Troops Good, now for Israel Good. Soon to come out in favor of baseball

Santorum vs. Ron Paul: that's an interesting fight... wish they had let it go on.

Cain: what I really meant was

Fox makes a Ron Paul drug joke. Should have invited Gary Johnson

Did *Rick Santorum* just say "tramples the rights of gays"?!? Oh, just in Iran.

Ron Paul is in the same party as these folks?!?

Newt: Godwins Law Fail

Cain: What I really meant was

Bachmann should have prepped a better answer for "submissive" question. Could have homered, gets a single

Mitt tries to talk about gay marriage without saying anything. Runs out of stuff to say and has to commit.

Huntsman takes high road on civil unions, loses votes

Santorum probably jumping up and down: Me next! Me Next!

I haven't heard Ron Paul say GOLD all night

Santorum really working for that BVP endorsement

Mitt: If I say enough, it buries my answer

Huntsman: 中國哲學書電子化計劃

Morrie Taylor was much more entertaining than Herman Cain

Newt tries to ride Paul's Sound Money train

SANTORUM gets the gold question? Paul: Me next! Me Next!

Santorum calls Paul "mostly wrong"

in honor of debate I'm drinking tea

Huntsman: Repeal No Child Left behind. Applause from 2007 Democrats

Closing statements: Santorum namechecks Grassley, complains about time

Paul: GOLD! Drink!

Bachmann: ONE... TERM... PRESIDENT!

All candidates come out in favor of I Love America. SO there's room on the other side of that issue

Most candidates shake hands with crowd, Paul and Santorum continue debating each other

Whose Fault are Mitt's Hecklers?

Whose Fault are Mitt's Hecklers?

Mitt Romney got goaded into saying "corporations are people" today, a line which could come in handy for Democrats if he manages to get nominated because it's his turn.

But that wasn't the headline on the Kathie Obradovich piece. Instead, the focus was:
Romney’s question-and-answer session after the speech was interrupted by crowd members who shouted questions about raising taxes on the wealthy for Social Security. The heckling was more sustained and organized than I’ve seen at the soapbox before.
I'm not naming the group, though Obradovich does, because I don't want to give them the attention. But you know them: they're incapable of issuing a press release that doesn't include the word "DEMAND." Hey Hey, Ho Ho, somethingsomething's got to go. And When De We Want It? NOW!

Obradovich describes them as "known for confrontational politics." You know, stuff like challenging the lieutenant governor at a party convention for being, quoting here, "too corporate" rather than offering a challenge to a governor who could have legitemately been vulnerable to one.

Hey, didn't I see you down at headquarters making get out the vote calls? Didn't think so. Because you don't get on TV - as I'm writing they just played the clip on "Hardball" - for making get out the vote calls.

My parents, 70something retired teachers, are my barometer of pure independent voters. And they live in one of the two Wisconsin state senate districts that flipped from red to blue this week. Two nuggets of dad's wisdom are relevant here.

Nugget 1: "I used to believe that trickle down stuff. But now I see they're not letting any of it trickle down." On the substance of the issues, hecklers, you're winning the independents. Republican extremism is turning people like my parents into solid blue votes.

But your rhetorical style is putting them off. Nugget 2: "I don't like extremists on either side about anything." Chanting "Wall Street Greed" at Mitt Romney may feel good, and it's definitely accurate. But the 2, 4, 6, 8, Organize And Smash The State rhetorical flair -- and remember, I voted for Ralph Nader once -- is counterproductive. And Team Mitt was quick with a reply. From the inbox:
Campaigns are defined by moments.

Today, Mitt Romney had one of those defining moments while on the "Soapbox" at the Iowa State Fair when he was confronted by liberal hecklers.

Mitt said, "I am not going to raise taxes. And if you want someone who's going to raise taxes, you can vote for Barack Obama."
Thanks, guys. Glad you could help.

I suggest taking the cues from this winter's Battle of Madison. There was enough protesting and building occupation to warm the heart of anyone who favors... let's see if I can channel my twentysomething self... direct action over electoralism. But the voices carrying the messages were Regular Joes and Regular Janes, using the language of work and family rather than faux-revolutionary sloganeering. The peer to peer communication changed more minds and almost flipped the Wisconsin Senate, one door at a time.

Then again, the media needs to look in the mirror. If the hecklers hadn't gotten up in Mitt's face, would their viewpoint have gotten a mention?

UPDATE: tons of media attention. Lesson learned: to get coverage, act like a jerk. I have no patience for it on either side.

Thursday's Tab Clear-out

Thursday's Tab Clear-out

I'm Ames info-overloaded to the point that the browser is slowing down from the sheer number of open tabs. Here's the highlights:

First Rick Parry steps on the straw poll, now we have Sarah Palin doing it too. At least the Platypus is actually doing something; Palin is just engaging in her usual self-indulgent pot-stirring. The real losers there are the second-tier contenders who just lost their TV cameras for their Friday event.

Speaking of the second tier, I'd long been betting that Rick Santorum was the candidate most likely to vanish Sunday morning. I'm revising that; The Frothy Mix has an appeal to exactly to sort of social issue folks who'll walk on hot coals for an event like Ames. And pretty much no one else.

My new bet: make that pizza to go, Herman. You may not be last, but Newt and McCotter are pretty much on their own trips and not likely to be deterred by a bad result. They're Duncan Hunters, not Tommy Thompsons, and Cain's Flavor Of The Month, May Edition raised the expectations bar a little too high. (Is Bachmann The Real Deal or Flavor Of The Month, July Edition?)

It's debate night and here's a handy checklist. While you wait, the Ryan Lizza New Yorker Bachmann profile is a must-read. If you're in a hurry, the tl;dr version.

And after this weekend, look for caucus date warfare to heat up...

Wednesday, August 10, 2011

Ames Speaking Order Hurts Cain

Ames Speaking Order Hurts Cain, Helps Traffic

The Republican Party of Iowa has released the speaking schedule for Saturday's straw poll in Ames:
Noon- Program Begins
12:15- Iowa GOP Chairman Matt Strawn
12:20- Terry Branstad
12:30- The big picture of all candidates on stage
12:40- Rick Santorum
1:00- Kim Reynolds
1:15- Ron Paul
1:40- Steve King
1:50- Tim Pawlenty
2:10- Chuck Grassley
2:20- Michele Bachmann
2:40- Tom Latham
2:50- Thaddeus McCotter
3:15- Herman Cain
Question: Who does this help or hurt among the tiny handful of people who are going to invest an entire day without a rock solid commitment to a candidate?

Answer 1: Hurts Herman Cain. The guy who's likely to give the best speech goes last, after a sizable number of folks have voted and after the deadly, hall clearing drone of Thaddeus McCotter. Plus, attendees have just a half hour to cast ballots after Cain's done.

Answer 2: It helps traffic. The candidate who is likely to have the most die-hard, my guy or nobody else, not even interested in hearing the others supporters is Ron Paul. And he's done speaking 2 1/2 hours before voting closes. Expect a sizable exodus from the hall right around 1:30. (No, I don't think Steve King can hold them.) It's a dynamic I saw at the 2007 Harkin Steak Fry, where a good-sized I'm Only Here For Hillary contingent walked out during poor Chris Dodd's speech.

(Speaking of the Steak Fry, Team Tom announced this AM that the speaker at the September 18 event is political strategist Paul Begala.)

The other speakers who seem to have organizational structure and significant endorsements - Santorum, TPaw and Bachmann - are also front-loaded, so a fair share of the crowd may be headed home before the results are announced.

And I can't say this enough - be prepared for delays in that announcement, especially with the Colbert Super-PAC pushing for a "Rick Parry" write-in. (You seriously think some candidate on the bubble won't challenge that and demand it's not added to the Texan's totals?)

Rayhons running for re-election

Rayhons running for re-election

Here's one no one figured would happen on Map Day: the guy left standing in the state's only tripled-up legislative district is... Henry Rayhons?!?

The 75 year old Republican legislator has announced for re-election in House District 8.

That seems to complete the musical chairs in the district, which includes all of Hancock and Wright counties and part of Kossuth and has a comfortable GOP edge. House Majority Leader Linda Upmeyer has announced her move to House District 54.

The third Republican representative, Stew Iverson, has not announced his plans but is universally assumed to be running in open Senate District 4. Two other SD04 candidates have announced: Democrat Bob Jennings and tea partyish Republican Dennis Guth.

Another legislative announcement: GOP freshman Josh Byrnes is running for a second term in House District 51, which changes a lot and has just a narrow GOP edge. Byrnes won an open seat when Democrat Mark Kuhn stepped down.

Aside on Wisconsin: Taking two seats from the other party ain't a "loss."

Monday, August 08, 2011

The 2011 Caucuses

The 2011 Caucuses

The Republican National Committee has declined to slap any serious sanctions on the rulebreaking states that aren't honoring the calendar agreed to by both parties. The end result could be no Iowa caucuses in 2012.

That's right, no Iowa Caucuses in 2012... because they'd be in 2011. Follow the bouncing elephant as I stroll through the calendar.

Both parties have agreed on the same rules. Four states go in February: us, New Hampshire, Nevada, South Carolina. No one else goes before "Super" Tuesday, March 6.

That's turning out to be less super than it was last cycle, notes McKay Coppins at Daily Beast: "Assuming the current dates hold, next year’s Super Tuesday will include just nine primaries, down from 24 in 2008."

Some of that is just budget cuts, as states that paid for a separate early presidential primary in 2008 are moving it back to the traditional state and local primary date. But some of it is political maneuvering in both parties.

Last cycle the troublemakers were the Michigan Democrats and the Florida Republicans. Carl Levin and his claque of caucus haters, who don't care who's first as long as Iowa and New Hampshire aren't, have been quiet as President Obama goes uncontested for the nomination. (It's already too late to start a credible challenge.)

But the Florida GOP is at it again, with the slogan "We Want To Be Fifth," after South Carolina but before not so Super Tuesday.

They were looking at a non-traditional non-Tuesday date such as Saturday, March 3 or Tuesday, March 1. In March, after the four recognized early states... heck, I could even live with that minor bit of leapfrogging.

But enter Arizona. The legislature has given Governor Jan Brewer, famous for the Papers Please SB1070 anti-immigrant law, sole authority to move the date. Arizona Republicans want more influence on the nomination than they did last cycle, when their senior senator was the nominee, presumably so we can argue more about just how high the border wall should be and whether it should be electrified, a mine field, or a moat with frickin' sharks with frickin' "laser" beams on their heads. Steve King, you're really missing an opportunity here.

Brewer is fixated on January 31. That of course is a week before our Official We Really Mean It Date of February 6. But we're not even close to talking about US yet. In honor of Keith Olbermann, let's do a Top Five Countdown: "WHICH of these states will you be voting in tomorrow?"

The only way Iowa stays in calendar 2012 is if Florida is still willing to go with a non-standard date and if South Carolina and Nevada are each satisfied with less than a week to themselves.

Let's say Arizona goes on Tuesday 1/31 and Florida insists on We Want To Be Fifth. If they're still willing to do a non-standard date, that's either Saturday the 28th or maybe Thursday the 26th.

THAT assumes South Carolina, the Official fourth state for both parties, is satisfied with just a two or four day lead over much larger Florida. For now assume they are, and pencil them in for January 24.

Number three on the countdown is Nevada. There's much less tradition there than there is in the other three official early states. They were slotted in by the Democrats just last cycle because they wanted a western, Hispanic-influence state. Frankly, New Mexico had a better case, and they probably would have done a better job than Nevada. Two words describe the 2008 Nevada caucuses, and the first one is cluster.

But New Mexico was off the list because Bill Richardson was running. Shoulda took that left toin at Alba-koi-kee, Bill. And Nevada won't mean much this time as it's assumed to be in the bag for Mitt. So Nevada should be satisfied with a three lead time over South Carolina. Saturday the 21st in Vegas, baby.

But New Hampshire Secretary of State Bill Gardner isn't satisfied with a short lead time. He will insist on a full week before the next state, and last cycle he considered Nevada's caucus process, with its absentee "super-precincts" designed for casino shift workers, too much like an election.

That's why we don't have absentee voting at the caucuses. Officially because party rules don't allow "proxy voting," but really because Bill Gardner thinks that makes a caucus an election. And it would; the caucuses would be one big year-long absentee ballot drive.

So, New Hampshire on Tuesday, January 10 then.

Now, finally -- rather, initially -- is Iowa. State law, passed back in the Dave Nagle era when we and New Hampshire were still pals, says we go eight days before anyone else, and New Hampshire law says they're seven days before any other primary. (Dumb question: what if 48 other states pass the same law?) Of course, last cycle we broke that law to stay within the calendar year on Thursday, January 3.

This year, if all these puzzle pieces fit together, we can juuuust make it eight days before New Hampshire.... on Monday, January 2.

But if any one of these dominoes fall - if Jan Brewer gets January 24 into her addled brain or if Florida or South Carolina insists on a full week to themselves or if Bill Gardner issues Tuesday, January 3 as a preemptive strike... then we're not just into 2007, we're two weeks into 2007, because no one is going to schedule a caucus for the day after Christmas.

Monday, December 19. How many churches and school gyms and community centers are already booked for holiday concerts and events that won't budge on short notice when the Pole Bean County Republican chair calls in a panic wanting to schedule the room? How many parents are having to choose between that concert and their candidate? How many college students are either cramming for finals or done with them and out of town? How many frazzled families are frantically finishing the shopping?

The only person who could possibly be happy about any of this is Carl Levin.

Merry Christmas? How about Happy Thanksgiving?

Saturday, August 06, 2011

That Left Turn at Albuquerque

That Left Toin at Alba-koi-kee

Talk about slow on the uptake: I just got a joke I first heard maybe 40 years ago. And it was old when I first heard it.

One of my favorite non-political blogs is Twelve Mile Circle, a site devoted to geographic oddities. This week a post was devoted to locales mentioned in the Warner Brothers cartoons, leading off with one of Bugs Bunny's secondary catch phrases:



The line was first used in the 1945 short "Herr Meets Hare" (in which we also see foreshadowing of Chuck Jones' masterpiece, "What's Opera Doc.") Bugs' directional failure in New Mexico lands him in Nazi Germany, where he of course gets the best of Hitler and Goering.

Reading that post fired a cereal-encrusted synapse from my pre-adolescent brain which connected with repeated viewings of Cars and the renumbering of the Highway To Hell, US Route 666 and a cartoon light bulb went off over my head.

Always the same direction, always the same city. The Left Toin at Alba-koi-kee must have had a basis in real life. It was probably rooted in the glory days when Route 66 was the main drag from the Midwest to the West Coast -- the same era when Chuck Jones, Friz Freleng and Mel Blanc were working their genius.

And so it was. I can't find a direct reference but there's powerful circumstantial evidence:

"Route 66 is clearly shown following the course of Central Avenue. After passing downtown, the road angles slightly to the right, paralleling the river. Just after the Albuquerque Country Club (depicted rather prominently), it makes a left turn to approach the crossing of the Rio Grande."

Central Avenue was US 66 and Rio Grande Boulevard was New Mexico 194. It's no longer the Mother Road; just like Radiator Springs it was bypassed by Interstate 40. But it's still a busy city corner.

Westbound wabbits on 66 would have to take the left turn at Albuquerque to stay on course to California. A more instinctive right turn from the right lane would send you north on 194.

Adding to the confusion was a major change in the route in 1937, not far from here. Before that year Route 66 entered Albuquerque from Santa Fe to the north along 4th Street, about a mile east of the Left Toin. After `37, Route 66 came into Albuquerque from the east. And here is the political connection: "According to legend the rerouting was done at the behest of Democratic Governor Arthur T. Hannett to punish the Republican Santa Fe Ring which had long dominated New Mexico out of Santa Fe."

This junction must have been infamous among 1940s and 1950s era southern Californians. How many weary cross-country travelers, low on rationed wartime gas, came across that confusing Y shaped intersection, veered right onto Rio Grande, and wound up headed northeast toward Santa Fe? Were there any animators among them? Their love of inside jokes points to yes. And after that first time, it was a popular punch line, made all the funnier by Bugs' mispronunciation in his Brooklyn-Bronx voice.

Aerial view of Old Town, 1960s
The Left Toin as seen in the 1960s. Doesn't look too confusing from the air, but probably more difficult at street level.

It seems obvious for a bunch of reasons, most of all the animator's loving depiction of the highways of the desert Southwest, as seen in the epic chases of Wile E. Coyote and the Road Runner. It's a legacy recently revisited in the adventures of Lightning McQueen and Mater. (And, may they rust in piece, Doc Hudson and Fillmore.)

Of course, since Bugs generally traveled by tunneling underground rather than surface routes, I may be wrong.

Friday, August 05, 2011

Legislative Updates from Tiffin

Who Cares About Presidential Politics? I Need District Of The Day Updates!

In addition to the four presidential candidates, several GOP legislators were on hand at the multi-county fundraiser in Tiffin. As Iowa's worst case of OCD - Obsessive Compulsive Districts - I discussed The Map with a few:

  • Rep. Jarad Klein of Keota says of his pair-up with Betty De Boef: "I think Betty's made it pretty clear she isn't interested in running for the House seat." That would leave Klein as the only incumbent in the House District 78 race.

    As for De Boef, Klein says, "Whatever else she does is up to her." The Rumor Mill says De Boef may be interested in taking on Democratic Senator Tom Rielly in Senate District 40. That would require a move on her part, but it would be a move back toward her original turf (she moved east from Mahaska to Keokuk County after getting paired in `01.) And it would be a move into very GOP friendly turf. Rielly is number two on the GOP Senate target list, right below Mike Gronstal.

  • Muscatine's Jim Hahn says he will be running for re-election in 2012 in Senate District 46, but hasn't discussed plans with his new district mate, Shawn Hamerlinck, since shortly after the map came out. Hahn did note that Hamerlinck's home is close to the line. (Is a move in the making? Will Hamerlinck "go home" to a new home?)

  • Senator Tim Kapucian of Keystone isn't paired up in Senate District 38, but noted that two-thirds of his turf is new. He believes his strong agricultural background will serve him well with his new voters.

  • Also on hand was Lee County Supervisor Larry Kruse, newly minted candidate in Senate District 42. Kruse may be the last to know whether or not longtime Democratic incumbent Gene Fraise, who turns 80 next year, is running again. But he says he hasn't heard rumors of any other Democratic names.
  • GOPalooza In Tiffin

    GOPalooza In Tiffin

    Santorum: "It'd be great to be in the top half" at Ames

    Four candidates who combine for maybe 10 percent in polls -- Thaddeus McCotter, Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich and Tim Pawlenty -- blogged pseudo-live from a wifi-less Clear Creek Amana High in Tiffin, where a six-county group of Republicans are hosting a cattle call style fundraiser.

    5:00 and Longhorn Orange AMERICANS FOR RICK PERRY shirts are significantly mixed in the crowd.

    Just past the entrance Thaddeus McCotter, in a light blue Munsingwear shirt, is casually chatting with folks. I wait briefly for my turn and get introduced by Chris Rants, who says he got on Team Thad a month or so back. I noted that the the state party had seemed surpised when McCotter bid on straw poll space but rants corrected me. "The RPI wasn't surprised but the other candidates were."


    Jeff Kaufmann (on Team Newt), Thaddeus McCotter

    So, Thad, what's the soundbite Why Should You Be President? "I want to affirm American exceptionalism. We're a great nation and need to stay that way." He mentions polls so I bring up the elephant in the room (actually there are a lot of them in this room) of his asterisk status. "People will get behind the message, or not." Pretty casual. He's actually going back to New Hampshire this week before coming back for Ames. I ask about the debt ceiling vote, realizing with embarrassment as I do that I haven't even bothered to remember which way he voted. It was yes. "The possibility of default was just devastating. I think the president saw it that way too. It was an imperfect bill from everyone's perspective."

    A man hands me a card reading
    GEORGE LUCIA
    PRESIDENT IN 2012

    It's The Man himself. I politely chat; he's from De Pere Wisconsin and we discuss the Packers. The rest of the press corps tries to avoid.

    A few legislators spotted: Sandy Greiner, Jeff Kaufmann, and Jarad Klein. While I'm interviewing Klein, the hosts move the print blog and radio press corps to a table that's smaller and, um, cozier to make space for Republicans. We hastily gather up our excessive power bricks and audio recorders and shift positions.

    5:48 and Newt and Santorum are on site, visiting with the crowd and the TV folks.

    A Reagan poster decorates the podium. Press table consensus is 300 to 400 on hand.

    5:58 and I chat with Rick Santorum after re-introducing myself to two of the teenage kids who I met at the county fair mock election. He's got the 30 second sound bite down cold and delivers it personably: "I'm a candidate who's an authentic conservative, who's been there and stood tall when things are tough. None of the other candidates have beaten a Republican incumbent or won in a tough state." The expectation bar? "It'd be great to be in the top half. They say there's three tickets out of Iowa, and the top four or five in Ames can become the top three or four."


    Karen and Rick Santorum

    Patriotic rituals right on schedule: one woman near the back oversings the national anthem a bit. The prayer focuses on "national pride and civility" and restoring America to "a generation ago" (again, note Ronnie on the podium) It ends "in Jesus' name." Perhaps they are addressing religious diversity by serving beef (Johnson County Cattlemen) instead of pork.

    Tiffin Burgermeister Royce Phillips warms the crowd up, followed by Jeff Kaufmann of the House leadership. "There are hundreds of strong Republicans here in the middle of Johnson County (applause) That doesn't mean we aren't going to get along with our Democratic colleagues. It means We are going to stand up for our principles wherever we are in the state."

    Kaufmann introduces the other state dignitaries including Ag secretary Bill Northey, Senators Jim Hahn and Tim Kapucian, and recently announced Senate candidate Larry Kruse.

    6:17 and McCotter is on. TPaw not spotted yet. Audio is low. The orange Perry shirts outnumber a handful of blue Romney shirts that look like staffers.

    McCotter: "You as Republicans are the heirs of Lincoln and Reagan. You are the heirs of the party that defeated stagflation and an evil empire." Speech is VERY low key: slow, soft spoken, pauses about every fourth word except for brief bursts of ten in a row. I'm still not sure what the pitch is.

    Finally he outlines a four point list of "challenges." "Big government. Must start to. Mirror and reflect. Thechallengeswefaceinourdaytodaylives."

    "We continue to see Lyndon Johnson's welfare state close in around us because the Democratic party refuses to let go of the past." Obama: "Jimmy Carter in a better suit." (Newt later corrects him: "Jimmy Carter had nice suits.") The pitch is: cutting big government down to size. So nothing unique. But "We must force the big Wall Street banks to restructure." Now he starts to show something a bit unusual (other than speaking style).

    Foreign policy: "Our dear ally Israel must never be pressured by the United States into indefensible borders." Now on to the "73.9 card carrying members of the Chinese Commuinist Party." So he's the anti-bankster anti-Commie guy. Still, I think he works better as a position paper. Or as a speechwriter for someone else. Still he gets scattered applause lines when he hits the right notes. Not enough. To interrupt. Theunusualspeakingpattern.

    "Now I know this is a heavy messages..." No kidding. He tries to end it upbeat: "The ultimate salvation is you the American people." But it seems tacked on. Clearly a smart guy... but I'm not sure how he ever got elected precinct delegate (as he started his speech as length discussing his past in party positions) let alone five terms in Congress.

    After brief applause we waste no time forging ahead into the Rick Santorum introduction. Louder applause; he has a few supporters in the house, and not just immediate family. "We're gonna hit 50 cities in 14 days, and this is the biggest crowd yet." More energy already in the entire McCotter speech. "We've been to 62 counties and done over 100 events with Iowans."

    "This is the most important election since 1860." (that's supposed to be Newt's line!) "It's up to you Iowans to find an antidote to the virus that Iowa Democrats gave the nation four years ago."

    "Barack Obama is feeding a subtle narcotic called dependency. We need to lift people up to believe in themselves again. We have to find someone who matches their record with their accomplishments. Some one who isn't just checking the boxes now but has taken a leadership role." Take that, Mitt. "And we need someone who can win the election."

    So that's his framework. "Let's look at my record vs. everyone else's." He touches on the soundbite he gave me: beating incumbents in a tough state. I forgot the history of his two House races before his Senate terms: He hnocked off a D incumbent in `90, got paired in `92 redistricting, beat another Dem, both on strong Democratic turf in bad years. He moved over to the Senate in a good year, 1994. "I've gone up against the best the Democrats have to offer, against Carville and Begala in a state that's tough to win." Shouts out to Newt: "In Carville's book I was the 3rd most hated Republican and Newt I think you were number 2."

    Acknowledging another elephant in the room: "Yes, I lost in 2006 but just about everyone else did. But there's one thing worse than losing an election and that's losing your principles."

    "One of the papers called me 'the super pledger.' In 16 years I've never broken a pledge. I sign them because I believe."

    After that we get some 1776 rah rah. Life, Liberty. Pursuit of Happiness. Without delving into abortion policy details, he says "We are going to honor all life." One person claps once. No one joins in. "They said pursue happiness, not guarantee happiness. True happiness is in pursuing what God has called you to do."

    As for American exceptionalism, a recurring theme of the night across candidates, he says: "If everyone is exceptional, Mr. President, nobody is." A father of seven has likely seen the Incredibles several times. "We are exceptional because we believe in you and you and you. This president does not."

    "For 100 years the left has tried to get this one thing done: government run health care. They knew if they could addict every single American to government health care, they could own you." Cites Says Thatcher saying she could never turn the UK around because of National Health. "A Conservative in Britain is to the left of a Democrat in America." I find myself strangely agreeing with this point.

    Says he was the only candidate to campaign against the judges last year (still looking for that BVP endorsement?)

    "In a week you're going to have the opportunity to narrow the field. Look at who the mainstream media is paying attention to. Who are they leaving out of the polls? And why? The mainstream media does not want to promote a candidate who can beat they candidate they favor. Obama." Also: All the other candidates have increased name ID except me. That's making a silk purse out of it. "Go to Ames and put it out there and fight for the principles and values we believe in. And win. And win." He is assertively continuing past his time limit. "Let them know what you think is right for America. And by the way vote for me." Solid applause (McCotter's was more mercy applause.)

    Straight into the Newt Intro as the Santorums head to the lobby. 6:54.

    "This can't be an election just about the presidency. We need a dozen senate seats and 30 or 40 House seats to have a second Contrac with America and spend the first 90 days restructuring America. We nead the whole team. Turning this country around will be an eight year job and we will need your help every day."

    "How many of you believe in the 10th Amendment?" Most hands go up. "10th amendment enforcement will be in the second Contract With America." Newt's signature song, remixed for the 21st century. Two supporters are incongrously standing in the back with a Georgia flag (the newer, non-Confederate version).

    Obama "combines radicalism with incompetence." Compares negotiating with Clinton, saying Clinton was someone he was able to work with. But "When Obama is radical he's competent. (health care.) When he's not radical he's not competent. When he's doing well he's doing the wrong thing and when he's doing poor he's doing the right thing." This goes over better than pretty much anything McCotter or Santorum said.

    "We're already in the Obama Depression, there's a danger we could get into a much deeper one. Having 9 or 10 precent unemployment in a Democratic society is dangerous." The solution is tax cuts and it's an applause line. As a professor he's more entertaining than McCotter.

    Replace the EPA with an "Environmental SOLUTIONS Agency" that takes the economy into account. Everyone likes this and likes repeal Dodd-Frank finance bill. "Repeal Dodd-Frank or next year we'll repeal them." Cracking down on the National Labor Relations Board draws very scattered but very enthusiastic exclamations.

    As for energy he's all in on ethanol as a choice of "South Dakota over Saudi Arabia" He also likes him some drill baby drill too. Alaska is "all locked up by liberals who are afraid all their arguments about scarcity will disappear."

    "The cost of class warfare is food stamps. Class warfare kills jobs." Tripling down on the Obama Is The Best Food Stamp President line. I may not need to mention this again. It got a lot of attention early, but now, just assume it's there.

    The 12 person debt supercommittee "should hold all its meetings in public. We owe it to the American people."


    Newt works the crowd

    Newt done at 7:13. Photogs are catching TPaw with Newt. And Pawlenty is on, that didn't take long. The Newt contingent exits noisily right in front of our press table while TPaw talks about a family trip to Wisconsin Dells. There's a punchline but the point is Pawlenty's a family guy.

    TPaw previews his structure: before we move forward we have to look back. He, too, blames the Iowa Democrats for Obama. (You're welcome.) "Before you put somebody in the White House, we ought to make sure he actually accomplished something." Plays the speeches card and the community organizer card and the "Obamacare must be repealed in its entirity" is a big applause line.

    So after five or so minutes of Obama bash he transitions. "We need to show Americans a better way forward" starting with the economy. "A 10 year old can explain this better than Obama." Cites actual 10 year old: "Keep the taxes low, then people will have more money to buy things. Then the businesses will be busier and hire more people. Then the people will have more money." It's a soimple plan. Not quite as simple as my "Tax The Rich End The War." Though his energy plan is half that length: "More American Energy."

    How is he different than the other candidates? "Did you do it? I don't want to hear any more speeches, I don't want any more empty rhetoric. Look at my record in Minnesota." Takes the approach of piling on the examples to make the case. "We need leaders who have the executive experience and results to be president." The Obama bashing got more reaction.

    Crowd has thinned noticably. That's not a slam on TPaw, as a big chunk of that was the move to the lobby by the Newt and Santorum contingents. As TPaw concludes, Santorum us still working the edges of the crowd.

    So TPaw is the Results guy, Newt is Newt 2.0, Santorum is the I Can Win guy and McCotter is... nope, still can't figure it out.

    TPaw wraps: "The main way we're going to goof this up is if we nominate the wrong candidate." An implied Bachmann bash. "What good will it do Iowa to be first if we pick a candidate who can't win?" So, an appeal to caucus vanity? Will that work?

    The exodus accelerates to an embarrassing degree as congressional candidate John Archer is introduced. "We need new leadership... no, we need LEADERSHIP... in the White House." His shorthand for the incumbent is Liberal Loebsack and he calls himself "a fiscal and socail conservative." Cites his international travel for John Deere with asides about German health care and an extended discussion of "China is playing to win."

    Archer's from Scott County, the biggest piece of new turf for Loebsack. "It is shameful to me how Obama and Loebsack have dealt with domestic and foreign policy." So he ties the two together; works for me in a 70% Obama County, but of course I'm just a crazy blogger in a hat. More than half the room now either gone or in the lobby waiting to meet Newt, Santorum and TPaw while Archer continues about cutting corporate taxes and eight pound piles of government paperwork.

    "Repeal Obama Care" gets automatic applause at a GOP event the way "repeal No Child Left Behind" did in Democratic crowds in 2007.

    Looking over the presidential speakers, other than Santorum there was barely a mention of social issues. 90 percent economy, 9 percent foreign policy, one percent social issues.

    Now we have Dan Dolan, another congressional candidate. (Archer is the main-chance guy; there's a tea partier in the mix too.) His big applause line is that his son just graduated from West Point. He continues on through the whole family. He has almost as many as Santorum. This all serves as a lengthy introduction to the debt. "I'm not a career politician but I'm willing to serve."

    Nevertheless, he's still a more engaging speaker than McCotter. Moving on to energy independence with just a third of the crowd left. Newt TPaw and Santorum still visiting with folks. McCotter may or may not still be here, and how could you tell if he was? I don't see him. The Rick Perry contingent is still on hand. I saw a Bachmann table, and some signs, but not a big presence. She's in Cedar Rapids tomorrow.

    As I make my exit I chat with some legislators. Can it be that my big story is a mayoral endorsement and a District of the Day update?

    Tiffin Mayor To Support Santorum

    Tiffin Mayor To Support Santorum

    Just back from the four presidential candidate multi-county Republican fundraiser in Tiffin. That city's mayor, Royce Phillips said this evening he will be supporting Rick Santorum.

    Phillips did not mention his candidate preference during his early-evening welcoming remarks, but told me of his decision soon after the night's last candidate, Tim Pawlenty, took to the stage. "I think I made my mind up tonight," he said. Also on hand: Thaddeus McCotter and Newt Gingrich. Full story soon.

    Tiffin is one of the fastest growing cities in the state, doubling in population to 2,000 last decade. While his post is elected on a nonpartisan basis, Phillips is one of the few registered Republicans in elected office in heavily Democratic Johnson County. (But as I always note: we're in the top ten in the state in sheer NUMBER of Republicans, and in GOP caucus politics a vote is a vote with none of the apportioning or viability math we Democrats do.)

    Phillips was one of the leading local Mike Huckabee supporters in 2007.

    Iowa City School Board Candidates

    2013 Edition for those of you who found this old one via Google

    Iowa City School Board: Majority Of Board Will Be New

    If you're here from that Washington Post link looking for a hot caucus story, you'll have to check back tonight for my report from Republicanpalooza in Tiffin (a six county cattle call with Santorum, McCotter, Newt and TPaw). This morning we're all about the Iowa City School Board.

    At least four of the seven members of the Iowa City school board will be new after the September 13 election. Five seats are open and only one incumbent, Board president Patti Fields, is running for re-election. Gazette was first on line with the list after yesterday's filing deadline
    The prospect of the majority of a board turning over in one election was a big reason the now-shamed Iowa Association of School Boards so long opposed the switch of school board terms from three-year terms with an election every year to four-year terms and elections in odd years only.

    Eight candidates are running for four full four year terms, and two candidates are running for a two-year short term. Other than Fields, none has run before. Incumbents Sarah Swisher and Tuyet Dorau hold over.

    There's money on the ballot, too: a Kirkwood bond issue. Might boost turnout a bit, but not the way a bond issue for your own school district does.

    At the risk of getting people mad, I'm identifying candidates by age, generalized geography and party. Yes, it's a non-partisan election, but a party ID illustrates an underlying worldview. (And yes, I have voted for the occasional Republican for school board.) And geography mattered a lot in the 2009 school election cycle. North Liberty candidate Anne Johnson fell short district-wide but ran well there and in Coralville.

    Who's leaving

    Toni Cilek, 57, Democrat, north Coralville but identified as east side Iowa City, where she lived when first elected in 2002.

    Gayle Klouda, 60, Democrat, north rural. First elected 2004, re-elected 2007. As top vote getter she got a free year when school board terms got extended to four years. (With this election the conversion is complete, as the last three year terms from the last even year election in 2008 expire.)

    Jan Leff, 70, Democrat, University Heights. Served from 2000 to 2009, when she didn't run again. Leff was appointed when Michael Cooper resigned mid-term to take a job out of state. It was generally understood that Leff came back as an interim place-holder for four meetings.

    Michael Shaw, 48, no party, east side. First elected 2005, re-elected 2008.

    Who's running - full term

    Jeff Alden, 47, Republican, north Coralville. Applied for the vacant seat in May when Cooper announced his resignation. In the application, Alden said he is a psychiatrist and moved to the district two years ago.

    Patti Fields, 38, Democrat, east side. First elected 2005, seeking third term. Day job is as Vice President for Community Impact & Engagement at United Way of Johnson County.

    Phil Hemingway, 51, Republican, east side. Has feuded in past with district over contracting and safety issues, the sign policy at board meetings, and over the closing of the district's home building program. Also applied for the board vacancy.

    Sally Hoelscher, 45, Democrat, east side. Past Lucas Elementary PTO president.

    Jeff McGinness, 36, Democrat, southwest side. Attorney and former Iowa wrestler. Has huuuuge numbers of yard signs out waaay early.

    Bob Porter, 50, Democrat, rural west side (Union Township). Former Iowa City Community School District safety coordinator, not a friend of present administration.

    Marla Swesey, 57, Democrat, east side. Former teacher active in Iowa City Education Association.

    James Tate, 38, Democrat, east side. Not much info; this could be the Some Dude of the race.

    Who's running - two year term

    Statistical paradox alert: You could see a losing candidate in one race with more votes than a winning candidate in the other. I've always though it would be more fair to change that so this kind of thing could get done in one contest. In this case, give the fifth place person the short term.

    But for now, Iowa law says this is a separate contest between:

    Karla Cook, 65, Democrat, east side. Former teacher at City High.

    Julie Van Dyke, 45, Democrat, Liberty Township (somewhere between IC and Hills). Admin Assistant at University of Iowa. Active in "Coalition for a Greater Hills Community."

    So geography looks more prominent in the short term race, with the south end of the district worried that Hills Elementary could be the next Roosevelt on the chopping block. But Hills, even the "Greater Hills Community," is a drop in the electoral bucket compared to North Liberty and Coralville. So a Hills-centric campaign will need some allies. As for the four year race, there's not an obvious geo-centric candidate like Johnson was in `09.

    This county has never seen a vote-for-four -- rather, "vote for NO MORE THAN four" -- contest on a scale as big as the Iowa City Community School District (roughly 5/6 of the county voters) before. We've had small towns with vote-for-five city council races before, but usually you only have five or maybe six candidates. In the epic University Heights city election of 2009, the ten candidates for five seats were pretty clearly aligned into two factions.

    Here, there's no such obvious framework for the voters. Yet. An electoral jungle of vote-for-four with eight candidates presents voters with some interesting strategic decisions. What if your fourth choice looks like s/he'll get enough votes to knock your first choice into fifth place? It'll be interesting to see what alliances, and what yard sign combinations, pop up in the next few weeks.

    Thursday, August 04, 2011

    Johnson County Democrats August 2011

    Johnson County Democrats August 2011

    Just a brief update from the Johnson County Dems tonight. Electeds on hand: Bob Dvorsky and Patti Fields. Dvorsky announces his birthday party. Friday 8/26 6-8 PM Morrison Park in Coralville. Special guest Nate Willems, Lisbon state rep running for open Senate 48. The Iowa Democratic Party chair may also show up.

    Candidates on hand: School board contenders Phil Hemingway, Marla Swayse, and Patti Fields speak their piece. Mike Carberry speaks up for Jim Throgmorton, running for city council in district C. (Jim doorknocked my Miller-Orchard neighborhood door Sunday, which gave me a nice excuse to take a break from lawnmowing.)

    Another plug for the Obirthday party:
    Sunday, August 7th, from 4-7 pm
    Shelter 6, Lower City Park, Iowa City
    Suggested donation: $5/person, $10/family
    Also looking ahead: the fall barbecue is Saturday, October 8, 4 to 7 pm, Johnson County fairgrounds. Speaker TBA. (Terry Branstad Against?)

    Pearson Draws First Challenger

    Pearson Draws First Challenger

    This beats a Geri Huser comeback: Democrat Joe Riding, now in the middle of a second term on the Altoona City Council, has announced as a Democrat in House District 30.

    That's the turf of controversial conservative Kim Pearson, who pulled off a huge 2010 upset when she knocked off conservaDem Huser by 126 votes, with just 48.5% of the vote in a three way race.

    Pearson has been a conservative first and a Republican second and has been the highest profile House freshman. She starred in a lengthy Register profile focused on her uncompromising approach.

    Riding has Chamber of Commerce ties, and owns and manages a family golf course, not a bad match for this high-growth suburban area. (I have family in the district and there's not a lot of old trees out here.)
    “Our current political system is broken, with too many legislators putting their own partisan ideology before the needs of their constituents,” Riding said today. “Growing up in a family business has taught me important values, like working with others to find pragmatic solutions to problems. I am running to bring some needed civility and common sense back to the statehouse for the citizens of Eastern Polk County.”

    The district sheds its piece of Jasper County and pulls all the way into eastern Polk. The changes actually help Pearson: her old district had a Democratic registration edge of 1200, which drops to just 100 under the new lines.

    But as I noted at District Of The Day time: "The difference between a protest vote for a relative unknown in 2010 and a vote to re-elect a controversial known quantity in 2012 will matter more than the lines." I wouldn't be surprised to see primaries in both parties for this seat. Huser drew a labor challenge in 2008, and the GOP may worry that Pearson can't hang on against presidential turnout. Or, given the testy relationship between Pearson and the party leadership, they may not care.



    Also noted: Walcott Republican Ross Paustian announces for a second term in House 92. Paustian lost to Elesha Gayman in 2008 before winning the open seat in `10. He's already got a Democratic challenger in former senator Frank Wood.

    Worst and Best of Ames

    Worst and Best of Straw Poll

    Worst thing about Ames Straw Poll: More Iowa Bashing:
    Iowa Republicans, in other words, end up having a power that no other state, not even New Hampshire, is granted: two separate opportunities to cull the GOP presidential field. Indeed, we are getting close to the point where no candidate can survive a disappointing showing in Ames, because the media horde will suddenly have only one question: “Are you dropping out?”
    The phrase, as the departed David Yepsen used to say, is "two bites at the apple."

    Best thing about Ames Straw Poll: More Republican Infighting.

    Plus: Two cases that Debt War was an Obama win.

    Happy Birthday Mr. President

    Happy Birthday Mr. President

    And there's only one way to sing that:



    Barack Obama was only ten months old in May of `62. And despite the man from Hawaii turning Five-0, he's still a young one:
    In the 2012 presidential campaign, Obama is likely to still be the youngest candidate in the field as all of the Republican challengers who have announced a bid for their party’s nomination are older than he is... Former governors Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota, who turned 50 last November, and Jon Huntsman Jr. of Utah, who is 51, are closest in age to the president. Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, who leads in polls and fundraising among Republicans, is 64.
    So an argument for youthful energy. Unless...
    Among the potential Republican candidates who haven’t announced, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin would, at 47, be the youngest if she enters the campaign.
    That would cross two lines for me: the Older Than The President line (by a couple months) and the Canadian border.

    UPDATE: The original article has posted a correction, which I should have caught anyway: Thaddeus McCotter is younger than Obama and Palin. Still, I don't think the Duncan Hunter of 2012 is an especially likely nominee.



    Locally, the Democrats will be in one place for the actual Obirthday -- the monthly central committee meeting tonight -- but are putting off the celebration until Sunday:
    Join the Johnson County Democrats for grilling & games as we celebrate President Obama's 50th birthday!

    Sunday, August 7th, from 4-7 pm
    Shelter 6, Lower City Park, Iowa City
    Suggested donation: $5/person, $10/family
    That's not the biggest political fundraiser on deck for the weekend, though. Some of those old Republicans will be gathered in Tiffin for what looks like a warm-up mini version of Straw Poll:
    Eastern Iowa Picnic & Rally With The Next President (sic)

    Clear Creek Amana High School, Tiffin, beginning at 5:00 PM
    A Multi-County Event with Multiple Presidential Candidates Attending,
    Individual Donations $15, Couples $25, Family with Children $35
    A picnic dinner will be served. Come early to hear all the candidates.
    Confirmed: Rick Santorum, Tim Pawlenty, Newt Gingrich, Thaddeus McCotter
    Possible: Michele Bachmann, Herman Cain
    Not to be outdone, Democrats are also raising some bucks Friday night in Des Moines, at their annual Hall Of Fame Dinner. In a contested caucus year that becomes a presidential candidate command performance; 2007 saw five candidates in Cedar Rapids (all but Obama, who was early in his phase of not doing cattle call events). The cloud to that silver lining is that the honorees get lost in the shuffle and the sign war. This year, the focus is on the inductees: former congressman Dave Nagle and AFSCME Iowa Council 61 Political Director Marcia Nichols. Lots of other awards, too, with a special shout-out to our own Allie Panther for earning an "Ed Campbell Rising Star Award."

    But alas, I'll be with the Republicans. Someone has to keep an eye on them.

    And I guess I'm doing OK at it as I got a little attention this week in the Washington Post's second edition of "best state-based political blogs."

    Sure, I get an award Tuesday and I respond with no post on Wednesday and this glorified clip show today. Have I hit rock bottom? Not yet, but only because I dumped the pet pictures over to Facebook. But stay tuned, there's always a chance of a good Democratic central committee fight tonight.

    My secret? Sheer longevity, a touch of OCD (Obsessive Compulsive Districts), and Google News alerts on the entire legislature. (That produces a lot of false hits on Mark Smith.)

    Congrats to my fellow honorees: from the right, The Bean Walker and The Iowa Republican; from the left Bleeding Heartland, Iowa Independent, and Under the Golden Dome (who catch that Beanwalker was, um, an amendment).

    Despite the relatively long Iowa list, we grow a lot of writers here in Iowa and some good sites were overlooked. Most notable omissions: Blog For Iowa and Caffeinated Thoughts. The best way to honor them would be with your traffic.

    Tuesday, August 02, 2011

    Ron Paul: Iowa City Liveblog 8/2/11

    Ron Paul: Iowa City Liveblog 8/2/11



    Good morning from Downtown Iowa City, home of America's Number 4 Party School; 9:13 and we await Ron Paul.

    Was wondering yesterday if this was going to happen, but with the doctor's No on the debt ceiling (never any doubt there) safely cast and Congress on recess, he's back on the trail. 9:30 on Tuesday with class not in session if off season in a big way, but the straw poll is when it is. Seating is set up for 100 (98 after I steal 2 chairs) and not quite half full yet.

    I'm just remembering: yesterday was listed as a To Be Announced date on the famIly leader tour; never got filled after The Pledge backfired.

    This group seems less raucous than past Paul crowds I've seen. (of course, that 2007 Olive Court tailgater would be hard for anyone to top.) Just a couple folks in Ron Paul gear. I get the impression this is a Check Him Out crowd. My Blackberry buzzes; it's a reminder for this event.

    Indoor event at the basement of Iowa City Sheraton. No rally music.

    9:27 and seating closing in on full, with a dozen standing in back more out of preference. The late arrivers are mainly young. Staffers break out the extra chairs. Let's call it... 120. Don't recognize any Dem interlopers; where's that Republican for a day crossover? Media looks like two TV, three print, one me. Plus multiple photogs who may or may not be press, staff, or civilians. Crowd harumphing increases in volume.

    I see Richard Campagna in the house; he's a local who was the 2004 Libertarian VP candidate. Not seeing local GOP leadership.

    Introducer/time killer on stage at 9:36. He drops some applause lines and then plugs Ames. Actual intro starting and he's here 9:38

    RP goes deep on debt crisis: "we started 100 years ago when we changed our monetary policy." "When we had our revolution be believed government should be minimal." Sees Constitution as "a list of permissions" with 9th and 10th amendment limits.

    "We were able to get away with it for a while and we had a maximum amount of freedom." But then we forgot our roots...

    "That big fight yesterday is ongoing and will last a long time." Draws an addiction analogy, no, make that a direct reference. "We are addicted to printing money" and here comes the gold standard.

    "Governments our size always pay their bills. But what they do is give them money that has no value. The dollar has lost 98% of its value. We can't live like that."

    Now plugging Ames. "It's a vote about property rights, about the 2nd Amendment and the 1st Amendment." "It's worth 100 times more than other straw polls." (First applause line.) Notes he lost a FL strraw by 1 vote.

    "We're not just trying to change the presidency. We're trying to reverse the last 100 years."

    "I'm sick and tired of the wars we need to end these wars" (long applause) "That is the easiest way to cut spending." President can change foreign policy on day one. "Image what would happen if a president took office and sais, the trops are coming home." (longer applause) "Imagine if we spent that money in THIS country and not around the world." (more aplause)

    "We want to remove the restraints so you can keep the constitutional fruits of your labors." (appl) From this, back to Bretton Woods and gold. "The answe is not difficult, it's just getting out of the way."

    On to security state issues: "Give up our freedoms to be safe? (shaking head) I don't think so. (APPLAUSE) You're not safe because a policeman is guarding your door. You're more likely to be safe because we have a 2nd Amendment. (appl)"



    "If you destroy a county's currency, you wipe out the middle class." "I don't have a problem with people working hard and making a lot of money. I have qualms with a system where we have people making a lot of money out of an inflationary climate." "Who got bailed out? The ones who were ripping us off."

    Says liberals have good motives. "You want to help the downtrodden and so do I. I believe the downtrodden can be helped be free markets and strong currency. (Appl)" Biggest applause yet: Audit The Fed. Guess this IS a Ron Paul crowd.

    "Our foreign policy is designed to choose a Dictator of the week, not protect our interests." Structurally he jumps back and forth: foreign policy, economic applause lines, deep economics lecture. It's all part of The Grand Unifying Theory, but a tad hard to follow in a traditional sense if you're not a True Believer. He acknowledged: "I happen to believe our liberty is all one thing." There's barely a pause from thought to thought, like a very enthusiastic professor who can't restrain himself from sharing The Grand Unifying Theory.

    "Much more can be achieved in peace than war and it's a lot cheaper. (big applause)"

    "Our rights don't come from our government, they come from our creator." Calls printed money "counterfeit."

    "There's no economic benefit to war even though there's war profiteers."

    "I don't want to run the world, I don't want to run your lives and I don't think anyone is able to run the economy." (applause)

    "I'm optimistic because of the enthusiasm of young people." Sense a winding down at 10:10. "Hopefully I'll see you at Ames."

    Intro Guy fleshes out the Ames pitch: tickets, etc.

    We have a little Q and A, which they steer to press. Odd format. Usually Q and A in front of audience is questions from audience, and press questions are before or after in small group.

    Iowa Politics asks when Rand is coming. Ron: "I don't know the answer to that." Staffer informs him that he is coming and announcement pending. Patch asks about popularity with liberals. "I don't believe I have to compromise, but I think I work more with liberal Democrats than with Republicans," citing Sanders and Kucinich support for Audit The Fed. "I should work with anybody and everybody. The freedom message brings people together. It's an excellent opportunity to broaden the people that join us."

    "When the revolution comes about..." yes, he said it...

    Kathie Obradovich asks about Ames expectations. RP: "It represents the people who are motivated... last time we came in fifth which wasn't anything to brag about. We're determined to do better than (4th or 5th)"

    Iowa Public Radio on debt and credit rating. Paul: "I never thought for a minute we wouldn't raise it, but just theoretically it would have had an effect." Says gold is a better indicator. "The real default comes by debasing the currency." "They had a deal struck, they knew exactly what they were going to do."

    Now we get audience questions. Suggestions for what Obama should read. RP: "The Law by Basia from the 1850s. If you can't steal from your neighbor why should the government be able to?" I'll have to google it and it's Bastiat.

    NASA post-shuttle. "Nasa's broke and Obama's not interested. If we had a truly free market we wouldn't hAVE TO WORRY ABOUT IT." Loves space but not sure govt should spend billion$ on it. "Anything governments can do free markets can do much better. (applause)"



    They set up a handshake line, rather than the more typical scrum. Most of crowd moves into line. I see one guy in a Rage Against The Machine shirt which I'm having trouble to politically understand. But then I'm an old school Lennonist.

    The handshake is more of a chat than an assembly line as of 10:35. An advantage of being first event of the day; you're not behind schedule yet. Pity the city that's scheduled for A 7 pm rally. That's true across party lines, campaigns, and decades. After the handshake is the signup table; high percentages stopping and signing pledge cards and Ames lists. I correct the first impression; this is less lookers and more of the committed. Probably a high Ames attendance percentage in this room.

    Reminds me: I got a robocall last night, which walked me through a number of choices. I screwed up and pressed 1 for Obama, was thanked, the call ended. Had I been thinking faster I would have been undecided and heard the rest of the poll (facepalm) Paul had called Democrats in the past and I've heard other reports from non-Rs of similar calls. UPDATE: post-event staffer says they're only calling Republicans.

    We're winding down as of 10:38.

    Monday, August 01, 2011

    Kruse Announces In Senate 42

    Kruse Announces In Senate 42

    Via Iowa Indy: Republicans in the southeast corner of the state have a recruit for Senate District 42. Lee County Supervisor Larry Kruse announced at a local GOP fundraiser over the weekend.

    The incumbent, Democrat Gene Fraise, has held some variation of this seat since 1986. Fraise, who turns 80 next year, hasn't announced his plans. He has beaten Republican Doug Abolt twice in a row. It was relatively close at 53% in 2004; Fraise improved that to 57 in the 2008 rematch.

    "Lee County has a history of 'promoting' its members of the board of supervisors" to the legislature, notes Joe Benedict in the Keokuk Gate City. Both Fraise and State Rep. Jerry Kearns went from the Board to the legislature. Rick Larkin made a round trip: Supervisor to House, then back to Supervisor after a redistricting pair-up.

    Key difference: all of them were Democrats. Senate 42 had an April Democratic registration edge of about 3500. It includes all of Fraise's territory from last decade, when it was all of Henry and Lee counties and nothing else. This decade it adds parts of Washington and Jefferson counties.

    Kruse seems to be mindful of that Democratic edge, citing a "track record of bi-partisan results."

    Kruse has been in office since 2004; his supervisor term is on the same cycle as the Senate seat so it's up or out for him. While Kruse has county-wide name ID in Lee (59% of the district, with Henry making up 33%), the county elects supervisors by districts. So he's only been a candidate in one-fifth of Lee County (basically the north rural part).

    Don't Blame The Politicians

    Don't Blame The Politicians

    I'm getting really, really tired of hearing complaints that the "politicians should work together" from ill-informed voters who simultaneously elect people who believe in completely opposite things. And I'm even more tired of hearing it from a journalism community that places a false value on neutrality and objectivity.

    Last year was a serious washout for the Democrats in Iowa, but even within the landslide there are weird fault lines. A tenth of our state's voters simultaneously voted for a moderately liberal governor and an arch-conservative Senator. That's because at least a tenth of our electorate didn't vote on the issues. If you were voting based on ISSUES there is no way in hell you'd be voting simultaneously for Chet and Chuck.They voted because they liked Chuck Grassley's trick with the three lawnmowers better than they liked Roxanne Conlin's grandkids or, maybe, gender. (We're still in that no-women in Congress club with Mississippi...)

    One of the lessons I've learned in 20 years of an active political life is that the people on opposite sides have more in common with each other than they do with the disengaged. And here's an example from the world of the pundits. While I largely disagree with the substance in conservative Charles Krauthammer's piece, I agree with his analysis of the problem and the stakes:
    The distinctive visions of the two parties — social-democratic (sic) versus limited-government — have underlain every debate on every issue since Barack Obama’s inauguration: the stimulus, the auto bailouts, health-care reform, financial regulation, deficit spending. Everything. The debt ceiling is but the latest focus of this fundamental divide.

    The sausage-making may be unsightly, but the problem is not that Washington is broken, that ridiculous, ubiquitous cliché. The problem is that these two visions are in competition, and the definitive popular verdict has not yet been rendered.
    Dems win 2008, GOP wins 2010. The rubber match is next year. Given Republican behavior, I like Democratic chances.

    But Republican behavior isn't really being aired. From the left, Paul Krugman:
    We have a crisis in which the right is making insane demands, while the president and Democrats in Congress are bending over backward to be accommodating — offering plans that are all spending cuts and no taxes, plans that are far to the right of public opinion.
    I got a great debt reduction plan that I can fit 5 1/2 times in Twitter's 140 character limit. Pretty popular, too:
    Tax the rich end the war Tax the rich end the war Tax the rich end the war Tax the rich end the war Tax the rich end the war Tax the rich En
    Krugman continues:
    So what do most news reports say? They portray it as a situation in which both sides are equally partisan, equally intransigent — because news reports always do that. And we have influential pundits calling out for a new centrist party, a new centrist president, to get us away from the evils of partisanship.
    One of the problems here is that even President Obama buys into this "evils of partisanship" worldview.

    Partisanship has got a bad name. The Objective Paradigm idealizes the "Independent" voter who "studies the issues" and doesn't actually exist. If you actually "study the issues" and vote accordingly, 999 times out of 1000 you'll be voting a straight ticket one way or the other.

    Krugman:
    What all this means is that there is no penalty for extremism; no way for most voters, who get their information on the fly rather than doing careful study of the issues, to understand what’s really going on.

    You have to ask, what would it take for these news organizations and pundits to actually break with the convention that both sides are equally at fault? This is the clearest, starkest situation one can imagine short of civil war. If this won’t do it, nothing will.
    Yet we're taught from grade school up to "Vote For The Person Not The Party." People who can't make up their minds, or won't admit that they don't care, don't understand, or just don't have time between all the demands of Real Life to comprehend, brag that they are "Independents," which sounds like Independence Day and is therefore "patriotic." And then these are the people complain that nothing gets done.

    This isn't about "compromise." This is about us simultaneously electing people who believe opposite things. Don't look at Washington. Look in the mirror.