Showing posts with label John Edwards. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John Edwards. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

When Edwards and Biden Come to Town, It Changes the Nature of the Diner

When Edwards and Biden Come to Town, It Changes the Nature of the Diner

In science, the Heisenberg effect, or "observer effect," describes a phenomenon in which the observation or measurement of an event changes the very nature of the event.  For example, attaching a meter to an electrical circuit to measure the current inherently changes that current.

Or, in presidential politics, a candidate visiting a diner changes the nature of the diner.




Twin candidate appearances at Iowa City's Hamburg Inn bookended debate weekend as Democrats John Edwards and Joe Biden made the pilgrimage to the retro diner famed for its food and its high-profile campaign visits.  The two events tested, and exceeded, the limits of one-on-one caucus campaigning.

The Hamburg was heavily Heisenberg effected on Friday.  Technically speaking, John Edwards did not even set foot in the Hamburg Inn on Friday night, though Elizabeth Edwards did get in the door for breakfast Saturday morning.  When I arrived 45 minutes before the announced 8:30 p.m. event, several dozen people were already outside the Hamburg, and a glance inside the window showed every seat was full.

"It was such a big crowd, we decided to go outside," said Hamburg Inn owner Dave Panther.  A campaign staffer called for attention and asked the owners of the cars in the prime parking spots just in front of the Hamburg to move.  The feat was accomplished before the Edwards campaign bus arrived.

Elizabeth Edwards had just finished a book reading on the University of Iowa campus and was signing books after the reading.  The crowd outside continued to grow as arrival time approached, with many late arrivals clutching Elizabeth Edwards' books.  Edwards supporter Ed Fallon chatted with members of the waiting crowd.  His Edwards endorsement had made statewide news during the week, but the former gubernatorial candidate had declared his support for Edwards months earlier.  (He accompanied John and Elizabeth Edwards at an Iowa City stop in January.)  Fallon said it had been the campaign's decision to (in campaign parlance) "roll out" the endorsement that week.

The Edwards bus arrived playing the Rolling Stones' "Start Me Up."  Fading the track well before its closing line, "you make a dead man come," an announcer skipped the niceties and cut to the chase with a quick "ladies and gentlemen, the next president of the United States, JOHN EDWARDS!!" intro.  Edwards emerged, climbed up a metal stepladder and spoke using a portable PA system connected to his bus.  The speech was a brief, intense, honed version of the Edwards stump speech.  Recent additions include the theme "I can't do this alone, I need your help," and an increased use of the word "lobbyist" since the issue emerged on the national radar screen in recent weeks.  It's hard not to sound populist when you're standing on a stepladder.

The Heisenberg effect may even have extended to the normally friendly, folksy neighborhood mood of the `Burg.  A staffer from a bird-dogging organization reported that some of the wait staff had quietly grumbled about getting stiffed on tips, or even on the whole tab, from patrons who occupied tables for a long time waiting for Edwards.  Edwards did meet briefly with Panther and the wait staff at the door to the bus just before departing, concluding a round of handshakes that reached the front few rows of the crowd of 250 to 300 people.



The handshakes continued as the bus rolled away, with Edwards leaning and reaching out the window.

Other top-tier contenders have gotten inside the Hamburg Inn this cycle.  John McCain (when his prospects looked brighter) made an unannounced stop in May.  Barack Obama visited in April, but he'd be hard-pressed to do a chit-chat session when he drew (he says) 10,000 people to a campus rally that day.

In contrast, Monday morning was classic Hamburg Inn -- though even a crowd half again as big would have changed the mood.  Every seat was full, and a few people were standing, but movement was reasonably easy and comfortable.

I strolled in 15 minutes before the scheduled 7:30 a.m. start and grabbed a seat next to Sheriff Lonny Pulkrabek and county Democratic chair Brian Flaherty.  Not just any seat -- a seat at the Bill Clinton table, where the former president dined in 2003 and the most wanted seat in the house if you're a Democrat.  (Republicans like the Ronald Reagan table, where the Gipper ate in 1992.)

"I called 100 people," said Biden supporter Mae Schatteman, a small energetic woman in her 80s.  "They better be here."  The crowd, at about 75, came close to matching her goal.

The senator arrived close to on time to solid applause.  Panther started to introduce the senator with some biography, but Biden pshawed the plaudits: "I'm Joe Biden."

In an illustration of just how intimate the Iowa caucuses can be, Biden began speaking literally next to me.  I reached around him and placed my audio recorder on the lunch counter in front of him.  Biden reached down and carefully positioned my recorder about 2 inches away from where I'd set it.



Biden strolled back and forth behind the counter, at arms length from diners, occasionally using the restaurant accoutrements as props.  "If you're moving two trillion dollars of the economy from here to here," he said of health care, "there's going to be winners and losers."  Biden illustrated the shifting trillions by picking up a sugar shaker and moving it from his right to his left.  He emphasized one statement by tapping a salt shaker like a gavel.

The speech was short, the questions were many, and the answers extended.  Biden took roughly a half dozen questions and expounded in depth on each, for as long as ten minutes a question.  That's well over the seven minutes and seven seconds of speaking time Biden had in Sunday's debate.

At one point, Biden noticed a small knot of three or four people waiting outside the front door and interrupted his remarks to urge them to come on in.  A person near the inner door opened it, and the folks outside opened the outer door and entered.  The crowd near the door shifted, but not much, to accommodate the new arrivals.  It was the kind of moment that makes every other state except New Hampshire jealous.

Thursday, April 19, 2007

Weekend Campaigning

Too many candidates, too little time

Register briefly summarizes the seven candidates hitting the state this weekend: Clintonedwardsrichardsonbidenobama on the Dem side and Romney and Tommy Thompson on the GOP side. I can't get to everything; My one definite coverage commitment is to the big Obama rally at the Pentacrest (Sunday just after noon). More and more stuff seems to be scheduled mid-day and mid-week (two Iowa City GOP events and Richardson in Cedar Rapids) and I do have that day gig to deal with.

Tommy Thompson will be problematic for shorthand when Fred Thompson enters the race; can't go with just the last name, can't go with the first name or even Tommy T. thanks to Tancredo. In any case my folks from Wisconsin get the best line: "Just when you though you couldn't do any worse than Bush, Tommy Thompson runs." The voice of 14 years of experience. All we need to have now is for Tom Tancredo's evil twin Fred Tancredo to enter the race. Wait a minute; that would have to be Tom Tancredo's good twin Fred. That'll cause a little confusion; mind if we call you Bruce?



The Iowa Dems announce their June wingding in Cedar Rapids - Clinton, Edwards, Dodd - and take shots at Obama, Biden and Richardson for not dropping their other plans. Looks like that makes JJ the one command performance.




Other news: The Iowa Senate GOP tries to capitalize on Virginia Tech and pander to the gun lobby by arming campus security. Fails on a tie vote.
Sen. Dennis Black, D-Newton, called the amendment a "knee jerk response that makes us feel good."

Senate Majority Leader Mike Gronstal, D-Council Bluffs, called this afternoon's debate a "shameless" effort by Senate Republicans to "play politics with a terrible tragedy."

"I think it's Senate Republicans seeing an opportunity to try to win on politics. I think that's kind of sad," Gronstal said. "Republicans see this not as a policy issue but as a political opportunity. I think they ought to be ashamed of themselves.

Sen. Larry McKibben, R-Marshalltown, said arming campus police officers in Iowa should be a "no-brainer" after what transpired this week in Virginia. He called the argument that the decision be left to the regents "hogwash" given the current atmosphere of danger gripping the world in declaring "I'm happy to be knee-jerking."

I propose a new nickname for Larry: The Happy Jerk. Hey, he puts the football on the tee, I just kick it. Could have been worse; we could have had the dove-hunting debate again this session.

Wednesday, April 04, 2007

Morning-After Roundup: Hillary & Edwards

Morning-After Roundup: Hillary & Edwards

Yes, I know I'm blowing off Biden in Des Moines and Rudy in CR. Another day, perhaps.

Clinton

  • Press-Citizen leads with She Was Here; a second story starts with the story of Ike "calling" her teacher.

  • Gazette goes with audience reactions a lot

  • Register leads with HRC's react to Bush's veto threat of the war $/deadline; also has the most pics

  • DI also goes with the war

    Edwards

  • Nate Willems blogs it for MyDD.
    Senator Edwards' best line is still, "It is time for Americans to be patriotic about something other than war." And it is a very nice transition to talk about an economic, populist message that these activists wanted to hear. This audience was a little older, and if John Edwards is going to be the only Democrat to bear some resemblance to Harry Truman, Hubert Humphrey, or Tom Harkin - substantively and stylistically - then I think he has a real advantage with Iowa Democrats over 50. That is to say, of the group of Democrats who are virtually certain to attend a caucus, he may have an edge.


  • Gazette: Edwards: Leave Iraq. That's concise.

  • Register has a weird lead of "no one asked about Elizabeth's health." Well, probably because they got that out of the way first thing with Elizabeth's presence and John's short, thanks for the support comments.

  • DI goes with a health care lead.

  • Press-Citizen blows it off and talks about the basketball coach. Not that I have anything against basketball coaches, my dad was one. (Speaking of Dad, happy birthday.) But it's not all that far to Cedar Rapids, folks. Maybe the print edition has the AP story.
  • Tuesday, April 03, 2007

    Edwards Part 2

    Edwards Part 2



    "What inspired you to go from undergrad in textiles to law school."

    JE: "Some of you might recall me saying I'm the son of a millworker. Elizabeth said she was gonna shoot me if I said that tonight." JE discusses family background but says he always wanted to study law. "My life has always been about standing up for the little guy." "And I WON my cases by the way." I'm not a new Democrat, I'm a REAL Democrat. (Appl.) Dems have stood for poor and disenfranchised, and we need to stand up for them today. I would do it with great pride. Today that includes standing up for the middle class.

    Question about British soldies held by Iran. JE: Facts are unclear. If we were in the wrong I'd tell the truth. Honesty gives us credibility.

    Stem Cells: "It's become increasingly important to us." Restrictions are "insane." America needs to lead on this and all research. If we don't lead, it'll be done somewhere else.

    Little kid: college affordability. JE: College needs to be available to everyone who wants to go. And debt takes decades to pay off.

    Winding down. Plugs web site. Plugs signup cards. 7:14 and he wraps.

    John Edwards Cedar Rapids 4/3/07

    John Edwards Cedar Rapids 4/3/07

    Van Halen, or Van Hagar, now playing for the second time. Would get more praise but there was a Mellencamp situation...

    5:49 and I'm on the press platform with my blogging assistant for the day who also happens to be my daughter. She's taking some pics of whatever interests her and providing fresh perspective.

    350 or so here for Edwards so comparable to Hillary. I'm betting on a Live At 6 entrance as the Doobies sing "Taking it to the streets."

    They told me no wifi but as you see I got it. Thank you College Community School District.



    A Patton-size flag on one end of the gym; daughter thinks it's from the campaign (she went to school here 2 1/2 years and doesn't remember seeing it.) Now we have Bob Jovi I mean Bon Jovi but I like the typo. Some actual Prairie students sighted. The pre-planted homemade signs are here; "College for everyone" reads one.

    6:03 and I lose my bet on the live at 6. Looks like a Linn crowd, only a light scattering of Johnson faces. Oh no, losing music points for U2 "Beautiful Day". Why not go back to Joshua Tree and "Bullet The Blue Sky"? Crowd starts chanting "we want John" but I don't think they mean me.

    The vice principal stands up and my daughter groans. She denies that he ever gave her detention.

    Sheriff Don Zeller is going to do the intro. "He looks like a cowboy" says daughter. Gray hair and mustache, so maybe a senior Marlboro Man... Zeller was an Edwardian in `03 so he's back on board. Zeller alludes to Walter Reed to large applause. Bring troops home; "protect our homeland here." Intro is lengthy but this crowd knows and likes Don so it's selling well.

    6:17 intro continuing. Now I'm getting it: Zeller's not going long, he's s t r e t c h i n g. He wraps and Aretha sings R-E-S-P-E-C-T. So we're behind schedule as yet another song plays. Handwritten sign: "We Believe In Edwars" (sic)

    6:22 and they arrive. Loud music that I think is Foo Fighters. Crowd sounds louder and younger than the Hillary crowd but that could be Dave Grohl. Staffer tells me "813 signed in." So my estimating skills suck.

    6:26 Elizabeth says hi. Kids are loving the hotel pool. John is tieless, white shirt, blue blazer - stealing fashion from Obama? "The nation ought to thank Iowa for listening to the issues."

    6:28 JE speaks, thanks everyone for support re: EE's health. Re Bush veto threat: "Elections have consequences. If he vetoes, Dems should send bill that funds troops and sets timetables. America needs to be leaving iraq and all of us know it."

    We're past the time for incremental steps and rhetoric. How are we going to bring transformational change? Not by polls and focus groups; leadership and vision and specifics.

    On Caucus Night you'll know exactly where I stand.

    We need to reestablish USA as a force for good. We're seen as a selfish bully; Iraq=Exhibit A. Prez needs to show world America is an IDEA: Equality. Diversity. World needs to hear that from us. Takes actions too.

    Darfur: cites Chinese influence. (Deep foreign policy detail here) HIV/AIDS in Africa and medicine cost. Riches nation stand by: "what would YOU think of us?" Instead of spending $500 billion on Iraq, what if we educated 100 million children in the world who have no education? GOOD thing to do and SMART thing to do.

    In campaigns we have our "boxes" separating issues. But they're all completely connected. Wolds knows about uninsured Americans and it affects our ability to compete. My health care plan is "truly universal" (big applause) Everyone covered, choices, may ultimately be single payer. Mental health , preventive, long term. Portability, no problems with preexisting conditions (more appl). It's not free - 100 billiuon a year, repeal Bush tax cuts (bigger applause).

    Global warming: "This is an emergency." Cap CO2 emissions, auction off emission rights, invest in alternatives. Operational clean coal, carbon sequestration, ban no coal fired plants, fuel efficiency. 80% reduction in greenhouse gases by 2050. Agressive but achievable. "Time fior the POTUS to ask Americans to be patriotic about something other than war." (big applause) We must conserve "Can't solve with efficience." "If you can't say in one sentence why you're running you shouldn't run." So why. John? "I want everyone in America to have the same chances I have, it's just that simple."

    The whole world saw New Orleans: "The Shaming Of America" said the headlines. Here's some One America stuff. "Yeah, I'm still talking about the two Americas, because they are still out there." GREAT line. Income inequality is unhealthy. I'm remembering lines from January: "Organized labor is the most effective anti-poverty program ever in America."

    6:45. Talks about pay day loans "If it's two days to pay day and you kid's gotta eat, you'll do what you have to." Need to crack down. The ideas are coming faster than my fingers can move. He'll definitely lock down the detail-wonk vote. Not saying that's a bad thing.

    Bush and Cheney message: "Stay at home and we'll protect you." I don't want to cower in the corner: we are at our best when we are out there with courage and backbone. Daughter says "I agree." The Greatest Generation didn't stay home, they took action. And we need you to take action. Talks about One Corps, Edwards group out doing community projects. Nice idea. I liked it the first time I heard it, when it was called Dean Corps.

    "If we all work together, there's nothin' we can't do." 6:50 and the speech is a wrap. Here come questions. EE will too.

    And the first question is... the Iowans for Sensible Priorities question. They need to reword that from time to time.

    JE: Bush though raw power would let america do whatever it wants, that's just not true. Significant defense cuts can be taken: Star Wars (appl) some fighter jets. But a lot of the defense budget is for troops, and many now don't get what they need. Need to distinguish between weapon systems and service personnel. Need a dedicated stream of revenue for vet's health care so vets know they'll get care. "The USA didn't wait in line when we needed them to serve."

    Question: How can we get back money from Cheney? (laughs) "If I can figure out a way I will." We know there's fraud in Iraq, in New Orleans. Need to look hard at how people have taken advantage and get $ back.

    Kid "what are you gonna do for schools?" JE: Today we think about K-12 but we need to see education as birth through death. Need much earlier early childhood ed, and nutruition. US should invest in scince/math/tech grad programs. Still struggling with how to set up a system to deal with continuing education so we stay competitive. We have no systematic way to do it. K-12: need best possible teachers. Raise base pay (appl from all the teachers) Need to attract and keep better teachers. No Child Left Behind: would no eliminate, but needs change. Testing needs to be smarter, less invasive.

    7:00 and Farms: JE says corporate ag making family farms hard to compete. Need to look at vertical integration. Should be cap on subsidy payments ($250,000 says Harkin). Must be safety net for family farms. Praise for Harkin gets applause.

    Another Iowans for Sensible Priorities question about nuke disarmament. JE: Nuke non-proliferation needs work, so does chemical-biological. America should reduce nukes - how does US have credibility with Iran when we are producing new kinds of nukes?

    Saturday, March 31, 2007

    For Edwards: Ed Fallon

    For Edwards: Ed Fallon

    Since the governor primary I've met most of the candidates. I feel great about this field, even though Joe Biden beat me at pool. But John Edwards resonates the most.

    Edwards wants to go from "me first" to "us together." Edwards focused on poverty, even though it polls poorly and the poor don't vote. But he's though deeply and it doesn't come from an opinion poll. American needs to think big, be selfless, and return America to its position at a beacon. Need to show America cares about the least among us.

    Edwards has comprehensive plans for health care and the war and energy. No PAC/lobby $ says volumes about whose side he's on. (good sized applause though the crowd has dwindled.)

    We don't agree on every issue but Edwards gets the big picture. He understands the challenges that will make or break our nation and planet. He was not my first choice in 2004 but he has grown greatly. And Edwards believes in grass roots organizing which is critically important to winning caucuses and in November.

    I feel great about who Edwards is personally. He and Elizabeth come across as real people. He rises head and shoulders above the field.

    Wednesday, March 28, 2007

    Edwards and Edwards in CR Tuesday

    Edwards and Edwards in CR Tuesday

    TUESDAY, APRIL 3RD, 2007
    5:45 PM
    Senator Edwards to hold a town hall
    Prairie High School
    401 76th Avenue SW
    Cedar Rapids, Iowa
    (Doors open to the public at 5:15 PM)

    Stopped by Tom Carsner's Edwards house party; some committed folks from last time, some converts, some folks like me just sleeping around (I'm holding out for Jimmy Carter). Some committeds: Supervisor Terrence Neuzil, Aletia Morgan from the school board, former party chair Dave Redlawsk (whose polling one may have seen this week) and attorney Paul McAndrew.

    Tonight starts a bit of a busy season: the JC Dems chair election tomorrow, a fundaiser for Congressman Loebsack Friday, the offyear caucus Saturday, and now both Edwardseseses on Tuesday. These things should generate some original content for the blog.

    Thursday, March 22, 2007

    If Edwards does get out?

    If Edwards does get out?

    First of all best wishes to Elizabeth Edwards.

    Second, I expect the announcement at today's press conference will be a temporary suspension of campaign events.

    But. IF Edwards would get out?

    Helps everyone but Hillary. She is stuck at a 35%, 40% level and neeeds a third strong candidate to split the anti-Hillary vote with Obama. Folks who are backing Edwards have already rejected her. The "experience" rap against Obama will matter less, since that rap also exists, to a lesser extent, against John Edwards and his one Senate term. It opens an opportunity for the three credible also-rans as well.

    Enough speculation, we'll know more soon.

    Tuesday, March 20, 2007

    Edwards House Party in IC

    Edwards House Party in IC

    From the in box. Not a candidate appearance, but:

    Learn about John Edwards and listen to a Conference Call from John Edwards

    and Watch 2 Edwards DVDs and mingle with great people!

    What: John Edwards House Party at Tom Carsner's Home

    When: Wednesday, March 28th at 6:00 PM

    Where: 1627 College Court Place, Iowa City


    Edwards cancelled an event in Indianola tonight to head home to North Carolina and be with Elizabeth for a medical appointment tomorrow. Sincere personal wishes aside - I liked Elizabeth Edwards when we met in January and she seems pretty darn net-savvy - it doesn't hurt to be seen as The Loving Husband and I say that with no cynicism meant.

    So anyway. Edwards getting organized in Johnson.

    Wednesday, March 07, 2007

    21 Bars Get Busy

    21 Bars Get Busy



    Not as high profile as the Obama meeting but the committee for the 21 bar referendum got together last night. Only the Daily Iowan picks up on it - is that what we can expect for the fall? - but they did get Leah Cohen to call them "prohibitionists." Iowa City locals will recall that Cohen, owner of Bo James, fell about 50 votes short of bumping off Mike O'Donnell in 2001. Mike later switched to anti-21, which helped him beat 21 bar leader Rick Dobyns in `05 after Dobyns placd first in the primary.




    Quick links:

  • Edwards picks up some Vilsackers; the few big names from Johnson and Linn don't appear. Essential Estrogen says this is bad for the caucuses; I see the point but mildly disagree. I think the county chair types can be fair even if committed; we're not talking Chicago Alderman Louie Kneecaps here.
  • The Dems have finally found the phrase that pays: "Fully Funded Withdrawal." Some Progressive Caucus names here; will watch this one closely.
  • Interesting national numbers on immigration: Support for letting folks stay in the US and get on a citizenship path has stayed roughly steady in the 60% range but there's a recent spike in the GOP base, unworkable "deport everyone" position. Jonathan Singer at MyDD:

    No doubt those speaking out in opposition to creating a realistic fix to the problem of having 10 million or more people living inside our country's borders unlawfully are among the loudest -- or at the least know how to play to the media to offer the portrayal that their numbers are greater than they actually are. And in fact, many in Congress -- to many Democrats, included -- have become timid on the issue of immigration reform as a result.

    But the numbers speak for themselves. Americans want a comprehensive reform of the nation's immigration policy -- one that includes a path to citizenship.


    It's the classic strength of position curve that drives so many of our issues: the vast majority that support a citizensip path do so mildly, while the minority have anger and energy on their side. See gun control, stem cells, choice, etc. for more examples. And get ready for that Tom Tancredo surprise.
  • Saturday, March 03, 2007

    Edwards Raising "Coulter Cash" Off Of "Faggot" Remark | TPMCafe

    Edwards Raising "Coulter Cash" Off Of "Faggot" Remark

    Edwards gains for being attack worthy - Ann Coulter isn't picking on asterisk candidates like Biden and Dodd, is she? - but does he lose points for forgetting the Seinfeld Disclaimer? Anyway they use it to make $$$:

    In an email that went out in the late evening yesterday to supporters and contributors, Edwards campaign manager David Bonior asked for help raising $100,000 in a week as a reply to Coulter.

    Monday, February 26, 2007

    No pressure or anything

    No pressure or anything

    The REAL Register political writer, Tom Beaumont:

    Vilsack's decision Friday to quit the race shifts much of the burden of expectations in the caucuses to Edwards, the front-runner in early Iowa polls.


    Just the kind of bar-raising one doesn't need at this stage of the game.

    Wednesday, February 14, 2007

    Edwards: The other shoe drops

    Edwards: The other shoe drops

    Melissa McEwan quits too:

    I would like to make very clear that the campaign did not push me out, nor was my resignation the back-end of some arrangement made last week. This was a decision I made, with the campaign's reluctant support, because my remaining the focus of sustained ideological attacks was inevitably making me a liability to the campaign...


    A cautionary tale to bloggers with ambitions. Of course, it may be too late for some of us.




    Gazette has Joel Miller's slam-dunk Linn County Auditor win and more on SILO.

    And the Register digs through the pile of applications for the Board of Regents and finds Johnson County Treasurer Tom Kriz:

    Thomas Kriz of Iowa City, the Johnson County treasurer, said the Board of Regents "has been tarnished by its lack of leadership and its poor decision-making on critical matters."


    Loads of other prominent names...

    Tuesday, February 13, 2007

    Blogger Quits Edwards, So She Says

    Blogger Quits Edwards, So She Says

    Amanda Marcotte quits the Edwards campaign. Will the netroots buy her statement - worth a full read but here's the kernel:

    The main good news is that I don’t have a conflict of interest issue anymore that was preventing me from defending myself against these baseless accusations.


    Or will they contend she got fired? See comments at MyDD for more.

    Thursday, February 08, 2007

    Edwards Keeps Bloggers

    Edwards Keeps Bloggers

    Edwards passes the big test by keeping Amanda Marcotte and Melissa McEwan on board. Loses a few style points for the "I was offended" statement and the presumably boss-ordered eat-shit posts from Amanda and Melissa. But the bottom line is Mr. Catholic Decency is still demanding their ouster, and they're still bloggin' for Edwards. Score one for our side.

    Chris Bowers at MyDD:

  • The vast majority of established, beltway consultants would have told Edwards to fire Melissa and Amanda. By not doing so, it shows that he is capable of moving beyond tired, worn out advice. He is open to new ideas, including those coming from the netroots. We need more leaders like that.
  • It sets a precedent for all other Democratic campaigns this cycle when it comes to right-wing smear jobs and swiftboating. Unlike in the past, it shows that Democrats don't have to cave, and are not ready to cave. Any other campaign in a similar situation will now be judged by the yardstick Edwards has laid down. At this point, caving will make you look very bad.
  • Relative to the Republican Noise Machine dominated established news media, it increases the power of the netroots as a voice in the Democratic party. They listened to us, not to the establishment, and not to the right-wing.
  • Miss Laura at Kos has an interesting post on Elizabeth Edwards and her role in and interest in the blogosphere, speculating on her possible role in the decision to keep Marcotte and McEwan. I'm remembering Elizabeth's conversation with us bloggers a couple weks back, casually talking about peeking inder the hood at the sourcecode of a linkjacked site. Elizabeth also discusses the issue of blanging out blogs through excess control (or, perhaps, self-censorship)

    There’s a process, they want to make certain everything is on message...They want to run it through this sieve and the sieve takes all the life out of it, all the life out, and it’s dreadful.
    I wonder how much of this dustup was because Marcotte and MacEwan are young, strong-minded and opinionated women who on occasion use "unladylike" language. Profanity is by tradition supposed to be a male perogative, though we all know that tradition is honored only in the breach if at all.

    Iowa Hawk has a mildly amusing post of mock Marcotte memos featuring excerpts of Amanda at Panda. I'm linking because I believe that when language is being discussed, the actual words need to be examined. I hate hate hate news stories that talk about "offensive" language in terms of f word this and n word that without giving us the option of deciding for ourselves.

    Finally The Carpetbagger Report cautions Edwards' rivals:

    If other Dems will go after Edwards for keeping Amanda and Melissa on his staff, the ferocity the netroots would have aimed at Edwards would immediately shift to whomever launched the first attack.
    Agreed; any Dem who pulls a Tipper Gore by bashing Edwards over this is off my list. But I wonder how long it'll take Joe Lieberman? I don't know if aanyone in this year's field is as clueless as Joementum...

    So my goal in my next post is to offend someone. Who knows, might get me a job.

    Edwards Blogger Dustup: We Have All Been Dooced

    Edwards Blogger Dustup: We Have All Been Dooced

    Update: Amanda and Melissa stay on the campaign. More later.

    Interesting happenings today with the Edwards campaign. Anyone who 1) blogs and 2) is employed should look at this seriously, and anyone who also 3) is an activist should take this really seriously. As for me I also 4) work for an elected official so it's even closer to home.

    Recently John Edwards hired bloggers Amanda Marcotte and Melissa McEwan for netroots outreach work. Now the Catholic Church is demanding their heads on a platter. The New York Times describes their writing in Old Gray Lady fashion:

    Ms. Marcotte wrote in December that the Roman Catholic Church’s opposition to the use of contraception forced women “to bear more tithing Catholics.” In another posting last year, she used vulgar language to describe the church doctrine of the Immaculate Conception.

    Ms. McEwan referred in her blog to President Bush’s “wingnut Christofascist base” and repeatedly used profanity in demanding that religious conservatives stop meddling with women’s reproductive and sexual rights.
    In other words, they wrote like progressive young women outraged by the institutionalized sexism of the Church. Not all that different from what lots and lots of other lefty bloggers have done in their own way on their own target of outrage.

    Here's the bad part: Edwards is actually thinking about sacking them.

    In this era it's impossible to hide from your past. It will find you. A Google cache is forever (shudder). I'm not as familiar with Melissa, but Amanda Marcotte is a wonderful and spirited writer. If she's fired, the standard is set: any blogger who's ever written anything remotely controversial is off limits. Anyone with professional ambition will have to filter their writing through the Blandness Filter and their blogs will sound like mindless campaignspeak mush. Or disappear entirely, the way we lost Patriot Skullface last year when Charlie's excellent writing was thrown in his mom's face.

    It hurts progressives and Democrats by making a major talent pool off limits, and it hurts the blogosphere by mental prior restraint. I know I'm stressing about some of what I've written over the past four years and what it does for my job prospects, and one live resume has already affected my writing. Bloggers, we have all just been Dooced.

    Edwards, who's been the class of the field at blogger outreach, is under pressure from both ends. Chris at MyDD is going to the mattresses, both on and off line:
    While there is no way I will support Edwards with Amanda and Melissa are fired, I will immediately become a staunch Edwards supporter if they are not fired. Consider the heinous reporting that is being done in this story, where bigot William Donahue is somehow an authority on what defines hate speech, it is clear that the Edwards campaign will take a lot of flack from outside the netroots if they do not fire Amanda and Melissa. Keeping them on would show a willingness to take risks and stand up to the media in a way that most Democrats just are not, all because the campaign will be doing so in order to defend the netroots.

    The Edwards camp faces a series of simple choices right now:
    • Are you with the people who work their asses for you, or are you with right-wing extremists who hate you?
    • Are you willing to point out the double standards and hypocrisy behind this story, or will you cave to even the mildest pressure from the Republican Noise Machine?
    • Do you have any loyalty to the netroots, or was it all just sweet talk, where loyalty actually only flows uphill and shit actually only flows downhill?
    This is a big opportunity for his campaign. Whether he stands up or backs down will be a turning point for his campaign online. Either way, he won't be tied with Barack Obama in Dailykos straw polls anymore. It will be hard in one direction or the other.
    KagroX at Kos points out this is not just Edwards' fight:
    To the extent that the netroots seek to demand a show of loyalty by Edwards, that same demand must be made of every Democratic campaign. Today, the target is Edwards. Tomorrow, should this vendetta prove successful, the target could be anyone. If the other campaigns cannot demonstrate that they would have displayed the same courage we call upon Edwards to display, then they benefit from the right's strategy of divide and conquer.
    And just about everyone has examples of winger hypocrisy and outrageous things that conservative bloggers now in the employ of various campaigns have written. But the right sticks by their folks, subsidizes them, rewards them for their evil talents. And it was beginning to look like Democrats were going to nurture folks too.

    This may be stale by the time I get posted but I'm surprised none of the other Iowa lefty bloggers picked up on this today. Are we all job-hunting and keeping our heads down?

    Sunday, January 21, 2007

    Saturday, January 20, 2007

    John Edwards 3: Questions from Iowa City Audience

    John Edwards 3: Questions from Iowa City Audience

    JE says you can ask about non-war subjects too. “Try not to give a speech.” Obviously he’s been to Iowa City before.

    Pat Minor of West Branch. “The root of the terrorist problem is Israel-Palestine.” (Scattered applause). JE starts to cut off speech… “We need to ask Israel to accept Palestine.”

    JE: I went to Israel last year, met with leaders of both sides (but not Hamas). We want Israel and a Palestinian state side by side with security and peace. Bush has disengaged from peace process (obsession with Iraq). The difficulty now – and I have a different perspective than you – is that Hamas is a terrorist group. (One applauder) But there are clearly moderate Palestinians who want peace, and America needs to empower the moderates. Israel was considering unilateral withdrawal from West Bank, but would prefer a joint process. The 2002 road map is good but someone has to get us moving. We should not ignore and misunderstand that there are other undercurrents for terrorists. Arab world sees no sign of things getting better, and they see America using its power to spread its influence. World also needs to see America’s “better angels.” We have an enormous responsibility to the world, and the next president needs to spread our moral authority. Raw Power does not work. Next president needs to tell the people of world that America at its best IS diversity, and believes in embracing other cultures and faiths. And they need to see us leading on moral issues not in our short term self interest (applause) Includes Darfur (“Sudanese govt. propped up by Chinese oil money.”) What kind of signal does our silence send? Where is the America all of us believe in? They need to hear words, and they need to see action.

    Hands up all over the place.

    A Jennifer from Iowa City asks about prescription drug costs.

    JE: I voted against prescription drug bill. We tried to put in Canada provisions, we tried to get price negotiations, got voted down due to pharmaceutical lobby. We need to stand up to drug companies, take their power away. “Never taken a dime from Washington lobbyist” (applause). If we want to get money out of politics, go to public finance (biggest applause yet) “The real solution is universal health care.”

    Carlton of Iowa City (an 04 Edwards caucus vet) asks about gay civil rights. The hoodie is off and JE jokes about being worried about anyone wearing a tie on a Saturday afternoon.

    JE: we need to treat gay couples with dignity and substantive rights. For me a hard issue personally because of my faith tradition and Southern raising. My daughter totally believes this issue will disappear with her generation and it’s silly to have this debate. But it is real. The difficult question is marriage. For civil unions and substantive, not at this time for marriage. Some of that is personal and I feel internal conflict.

    Regular reader Josh on the mic! Asks Elizabeth what issues she’ll take on as first lady. I expect the same answer she gave the bloggers. “Laura Bush has not used that megaphone.” She is indeed giving the same answer. I’m feeling that crowded rally room heat building up, no one’s cutting out early, not even the TV folks, and none of the usual back of the room schmoozing. Still nothing about same-day voter reg.

    Melissa of IC asks about death penalty. “You’re not gonna like the answer.” I have historically supported it. Some crimes deserve ultimate punishment.” But there are huuuge problems in our justice system. I respect anti-death penalty views (hints that EE disagrees with him). Particularly people of color and crime is against a white person, you see over and over disproportionate punishment. Need to make system racial fair, provide good attorneys. “Rich people get one kind of justice and poor another.” (applause) There are also inequality problems in a number of our laws (powder cocaine vs. crack) Mandatory sentencing is also troublesome. We can’t build enough prisons to solve crime, many underlying conditions (poverty) contribute. “America is better than this.” We need an infrastructure to pull people out of The System.

    EE reminds JE that he supports NC death penalty moratorium.

    Jerry of IC is worried about manufacturing jobs going overseas. What’s your plan?

    JE: A lot of dishonest rhetoric here. Some parts of globalization are beyond our control. But some we can control such as trade agreements. Should be fair, just, lets American workers compete. Bust must recognize shutting down trade with developing world dooms them forever. Should have trade agreements with international labor and environmental standards, real and enforceable. Should not be a ruse to shut down trade (the North Carolina accent stands out on “rooooooose”.) We could set impossible standards. We could pretend we’re trying, or we could measure and set achievable standards. No child labor. Talking about China – I tried raising human rights issue and heard “we won’t be lectured by the country responsible for Abu Gharib and Gitmo.” “We have to be the light.” Repeats the China internal focus line. “China could soon be largest English speaking country in the world, because they require a second language.” He’s turned the question into Bush and education funding.

    Now completely on education and student debt (this is a campus speech after all).

    The rally room temperature is in full effect.

    Iowa City bearded fellow asks about deficit spending.

    “Put your truth monitor on every candidate on this.” He makes fun of over-promising. Priorities are difficult judgment. I’m committed to not making deficit worse, I’ll try to reduce… but we need universal heath care more. (applause) Same goes for energy and global warming. “If deficit reduction is your thing, I may lose you on this one.” All I can ask: “make `em be honest with you. You can’t do universal health care, energy independence, AND deficit reduction.”

    An Ottumwa woman asks about emotional wounds from the Iraq war.

    JE: Americans need to feel next president is an honest decent human being . Sometimes it’s obvious what you questioners want me to say, but you need to hear what I really believe. Character decency honesty and trust are important. America wants to trust and be inspired again. We need to be a “national community” again. Millions of Americans worry literally about feeding and clothing the kids, and it matters. “I confess I got an ego, just like everyone else.” But are you driven by that, or by a belief that this is the best way to serve? You’ll be troubled by that every day as President.

    And with that, he wraps and they crank up the Mellencamp, and the handshake scrum forms. Folks are saying “lookin’ forward to the blog” so I better go post.


    Post speech: this is the only Iowa event of the day, he's back to North Carolina to watch some hoops. So some of this is fodder for the Sunday talk shows. And I never did catch Ed Fallon.

    John Edwards 2: Iowa City Speech 1/20/07

    John Edwards 2: Iowa City Speech 1/20/07

    In the hall and we get BOWIE doing “Young Americans.” Not a bad pick though I’m a “Rebel Rebel” guy myself. Now we get a cover of Van Halen’s “Jump” (why not the real thing?”

    I’m scrunched in front of the sound guy; we’ve got half a dozen cameras, a full press table and several hundred in the ballroom. Standing room only. This feels like opening weekend of 2008.

    Took a break to look for local pals. Rep. Ro Foege’s here. Says the Harlem sermon on MLK day was fantastic, and he’s back on board. Ro was one of the few legislators with Edwards early in `03; most were with Kerry. Also sighted: Aletia Morgan from the school board, Recorder Kim Painter, former city councilor Larry Baker, and ubiquitous local Edwardian Tom Carsner working the room and no doubt persuading, persuading, persuading. Several purple and gold SEIU folks. Can’t remember if they’re officially on board but it looks like they’re headed that way.

    More Van Halen, this time the real thing: “Right Now.” Wonder if they know how much of a Republican Sammy Hagar is? Now they’re Beatling with “Here Comes the Sun.” Overall musical assessment: half a notch better than usual, which makes up for the dread I felt when I walked in and heard, you guessed it, Mellencamp.

    Crowd seems to be a young-old mix; lots of folks are apparent caucus veterans but the students are pretty well represented.

    The war came up not at all in our pre-rally discussion, perhaps because that’s the topic of the day for the main event.

    Three nice, hot wifi signals and I can’t touch any of them. Thanks, UI IT folks…

    “One Minute, Media…” and applause to that. I assume for the one minute, not for the media. And he hits the stage to… ooh! Mellencamp! John, you lose points for that!

    JE’s in green shirt no tie, hoodie sweatshirt. Yes, I can actually see. Elizabeth intros JE, gets big points for going to Nile Kinnick Elementary School. She cites Newsweek poll; JE leading McCain by largest margin among Dems and only Dem beating Rudy. They dispense with the usual protocol of introducing the local dogcatchers, and just go straight into JE.

    He leads, as always, with the “Elizabeth’s healthy and feelin’ fine” line. Talks about going on Jon Stewart:

    JS: “If you’d been elected VP, who would you have accidentally shot?”
    JE: “Dick Cheney.”

    On to the meat.

    Bush war speech. It was very clear what we needed from Bush: Honesty, openness, decency, and a sense he was doing his best. Instead I saw a sales job, reading a speech someone else wrote.

    We deserve truth. First, how we got there. I voted for this war, and I was wrong.

    Second truth: ground in Iraq today. No good choices: only bad and worse. I’m dead against an escalation. (applause) McCain advocated escalation long before Bush. (running in the general, john?)

    JE refers to Harlem church speech. 40 years ago MLK spoke in Riverside Church about Vietnam. MLK said he was silent too long and “silence is betrayal.” Those words apply today. America needs to hear from all of us. “America doesn’t just belong to the president, it belongs to all of us.” (applause)

    Congress also has a responsibility. Those who know escalation is wrong have the power to act. Not enough to pass resolutions. Congress has power not to fund escalation. “If you know the escalation is wrong and you know you can stop it by not funding escalation, it is time to use that power.”

    Big applause. This feels like a Major Speech with a national audience in mind.

    Congress needs to hear how strongly you feel about this, and your country needs you.

    Why is escalation a mistake? It misunderstands what's happening in Iraq. No military solution is possible. Only potential solution is a difficult political solution. Sunni’s need to be let back into the government. That’s the underlying dynamic to the violence. The militias are contributing, but there will be no peace until Shiite government lets Sunnis in so they have a stakehold in unified Iraq. We are enabling the pattern of exclusion.

    Military says it would take 100,000 troops to pacify the ground, and we’re talking about sending 20,000 into the crossfire.

    Iranians don’t want a chaotic Iraq. If Iraq goes, Iran as the only other Shiite majority country is in trouble. Syrians have a different interest. We need to make it clear we’re leaving, and the only way to make it clear is actually start leaving. (big applause)

    It’s clear what America should do. Our leaders should not evaluate in terms of their own political careers, but need to stand up and do what’s right. They can stop this surge. It’s a test of leadership and courage. Don’t go home and worry – take action. We can’t wait for somebody else to do this for us. Your county needs to hear your voice.

    John Edwards 1: Bloggers Meet with John and Elizabeth

    John Edwards 1: Bloggers Meet with John and Elizabeth

    Half dozen of us, they’ll all get the link love later.

    We’re talking about Edwards’ community service programs including the comedy even “Laugh your cans off.” Sounds like Dean Corps, but a good idea is still a good idea even if borrowed.

    Political Fallout is here, Iowa for Edwards, and mostly people who blog on the Edwards site. So kind of softball today? We’ll see.

    National day of action energy project – that’s next week. I biked here today so that’s good (if cold).

    She’s here. He is too, and so’s Ed Fallon. That ought to help on the left edge of the People’s Republic…

    Lots of insider virtual-Edwards jokes flying, I guess I’m missing out, huh.

    Elizabeth has been sneaking peeks at source code, something about an Edwards link going to Hillary …

    Kyoto treaty? Edwards says 1) we have to engage on the issue and if we had to sign to make changes, we should. CAFÉ Standards? JE doesn’t nail down a specific MPG but the numbers 38-42 slide out?

    Military Commissions Act? “Every time I hear the name I get thrown off.” Eliz says “sounds like base closings. JE: We should meet Geneva accords, which we have not. There must be some method for anyone to challenge custody and get a hearing. Gitmo sends terrible signal to world. Heard it over and over in China.

    Would you demilitarize space? JE: China a difficult question. China has no interest in letting us know what they’re doing. We have treaty obligations with Taiwan and how do we best deter a conflict. F22 should be kept, F35 could be cut in half. We’ve thrown enormous money away on Star Wars.

    China is a very complicated relationship for the US – human rights, environment… they are entirely inward focused which drives their foreign policy. Thus difficult to get them to act on international issues. Would like to quietly build up military, but they need world to be relatively stable. Rocking the boat might cut off energy supply.

    Mental health parity. JE says should be federal issue. We should have complete parity, mandated in health insurance contracts. I think we need universal health care with no distinction.

    JE leaves.

    Political Fallout and I raise gay marriage. EE says, “We don’t stand exactly same place. I don’t think he believes US constitution should be amended to limit state.” The light we see: next generation does not have same fear. JE completely against DOMA. A lot of analogies with 14 year old marriage – states can make good decisions as well as bad decisions.” Says we need to do all we can at fed level to eliminate discrimination.

    EE says her health is good, some discussion of personal cancer issues. Blames fatigue not on cancer but on having a husband running for prez and two young kids, and some discussion of Kate and law school.

    Getting really really softball here, chit chat about the “Home” book. Nice stories, but clearly an Edwards bunch here. Discussion of a Des Moines book signing.

    First Lady cause? “Can’t do everything”, but she talks about after school programs, they started programs in memory of their late son. Actually mentions white flight. Second - She’s a Navy brat, I hadn’t heard that before. Military families can’t complain about living conditions for fear of hurting promotion chances. Finally – election reform. Against electronic voting. People turned off to voting to begin with, and even worse if people doubt the counting. (But no mention of e-day registration and campaign finance reform)

    Education – what can we do to change focus to make a classroom enriching? EE says “teach critical thinking”. Creative and critical think are first things out the door when rote memorization for standardized testing is emphasized. Problem with No Child is less testing than penalties. NC program doesn’t penalize; sends in “SWAT Team” to look at all possible shortcomings. “Then they fund the fix.” Turned around 70-80% of failing schools. But not working now with No Child on top of it.

    Wrapping up here. Hoping to catch Ed sometime today.